On Relationship Between Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Disturbance Observers and Its Applications

被引:48
|
作者
Su, Jinya [1 ]
Chen, Wen-Hua [1 ]
Yang, Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Dept Aeronaut & Automot Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Automat, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
functional disturbance observer (FDOB); reduced-order; nonminimum phase; time/frequency-domain design; ADRC; SYSTEMS; REJECTION; STABILITY; EXISTENCE; DESIGN; STATE;
D O I
10.1115/1.4033631
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper provides a generic analysis of the relationship between time-and frequency-domain disturbance observer (DOB) design methodology. It is discovered that the traditional frequency-domain DOBs using a low-pass filter with unity gain can only handle disturbances satisfying matching condition, while the traditional time-domain DOBs always generate an observer with a high-order. A functional disturbance observer (FDOB) is proposed to improve the existing results together with its design guideline, frequency analysis, and existence condition. Compared with the existing frequency-domain DOBs, the proposed FDOB can handle more classes of disturbances, while compared with the existing time-domain DOBs, the proposed FDOB can generate an observer with a lower-order. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the main findings of this paper including a rotary mechanical system of nonminimum phase.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fast Synchrophasor Estimation by Means of Frequency-Domain and Time-Domain Algorithms
    Belega, Daniel
    Macii, David
    Petri, Dario
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2014, 63 (02) : 388 - 401
  • [32] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    Hernandez-Becerra, P. A. I.
    Balleza-Ordaz, M.
    Vargas-Luna, M.
    Delgadillo-Holtfort, I.
    INSTRUMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 62 (02) : 241 - 246
  • [33] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    P. A. I. Hernández-Becerra
    M. Balleza-Ordaz
    M. Vargas-Luna
    I. Delgadillo-Holtfort
    Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 2019, 62 : 241 - 246
  • [34] Design PID controllers for desired time-domain or frequency-domain response
    Zhang, WD
    Xi, YG
    Yang, GK
    Xu, XM
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2002, 41 (04) : 511 - 520
  • [35] Cognitive processing in sleep as revealed by time-domain and frequency-domain components
    Karakas, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 69 (03) : 154 - 154
  • [36] A Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Microwave Imaging of Experimental Targets
    Saraskanroud, Forouz Mahdinezhad
    Jeffrey, Ian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING, 2021, 7 (07) : 611 - 623
  • [37] Time-Domain vs. Frequency-Domain Equalization for FTN Signaling
    Li, Shuangyang
    Yuan, Weijie
    Yuan, Jinhong
    Bai, Baoming
    Ng, Derrick Wing Kwan
    Hanzo, Lajos
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (08) : 9174 - 9179
  • [38] Time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to identification of bridge flutter derivatives
    Chen Z.
    Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2009, 3 (2): : 173 - 179
  • [39] A frequency-domain SIR maximizing time-domain equalizer for VDSL systems
    Lin, YP
    Liang, LH
    Chung, PJ
    Phoong, SM
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS), VOLS 1-6, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 3163 - 3166
  • [40] A SIMPLE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS
    GOMEZTREVINO, E
    GEOPHYSICS, 1987, 52 (10) : 1418 - 1423