Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environment on student attitudes and learning outcomes

被引:46
作者
Byers, Terry [1 ]
Imms, Wes
Hartnell-Young, Elizabeth
机构
[1] Anglican Church Grammar Sch, East Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Classroom space; Engagement; Learning experiences; Learning outcomes; Quasi-experimental; Secondary school; SCHOOL; ENGAGEMENT; SPACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explored the claim that different classroom layouts can affect teaching and learning. At the time of the study, there were few robust evaluative frameworks able to isolate and then measure the impact of different educational layouts. In response, this study employed a quasi-experimental approached facilitated by a Single Subject Research Design (SSRD) to compare two different classroom layouts - a traditional classroom layout and `Innovative Learning Environment' (ILE) in an Australian secondary schooling context. The study compared students' attitudes to their learning experiences, motivation, engagement and academic outcomes in each layout over a school year. Comparative analyses highlighted how students' attitudes to their learning experiences and engagement differed in the two designs. A correlation was identified between enhanced student attitudes in an ILE and higher English, Humanities and Mathematics academic achievement when compared with cognitively matched peers who occupied a traditional classroom for the same period. This initial empirical evidence, even though restricted to a single site, was able to discern a measurable link between the occupation of different learning spaces and an impact on student learning experiences, engagement and academic outcomes in secondary schooling context.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dumont H., 2010, ANAL DESIGNING LEARN
  • [22] Fraser B.J., 1982, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN, P511, DOI DOI 10.3102/01623737004004511
  • [23] School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence
    Fredricks, JA
    Blumenfeld, PC
    Paris, AH
    [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (01) : 59 - 109
  • [24] Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education
    Gersten, R
    Fuchs, LS
    Compton, D
    Coyne, M
    Greenwood, C
    Innocenti, MS
    [J]. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2005, 71 (02) : 149 - 164
  • [25] Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians
    Ghasemi, Asghar
    Zahediasl, Saleh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2012, 10 (02) : 486 - 489
  • [26] Gislason N., 2010, Learning Environments Research, V13, P127, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10984-010-9071-X
  • [27] Gliem J.A., 2003, 2003 MIDWEST RES PRA, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-88933-1.50023-4
  • [28] Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model
    John A C Hattie
    Gregory M Donoghue
    [J]. npj Science of Learning, 1 (1)
  • [29] Higgins S., 2005, The impact of school environments: A literature review
  • [30] Imms W, 2016, LEARNING ENV RES, V19, P1, DOI [10.1007/s10984-016-9210-0, DOI 10.1007/S10984-016-9210-0]