Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environment on student attitudes and learning outcomes

被引:46
作者
Byers, Terry [1 ]
Imms, Wes
Hartnell-Young, Elizabeth
机构
[1] Anglican Church Grammar Sch, East Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Classroom space; Engagement; Learning experiences; Learning outcomes; Quasi-experimental; Secondary school; SCHOOL; ENGAGEMENT; SPACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explored the claim that different classroom layouts can affect teaching and learning. At the time of the study, there were few robust evaluative frameworks able to isolate and then measure the impact of different educational layouts. In response, this study employed a quasi-experimental approached facilitated by a Single Subject Research Design (SSRD) to compare two different classroom layouts - a traditional classroom layout and `Innovative Learning Environment' (ILE) in an Australian secondary schooling context. The study compared students' attitudes to their learning experiences, motivation, engagement and academic outcomes in each layout over a school year. Comparative analyses highlighted how students' attitudes to their learning experiences and engagement differed in the two designs. A correlation was identified between enhanced student attitudes in an ILE and higher English, Humanities and Mathematics academic achievement when compared with cognitively matched peers who occupied a traditional classroom for the same period. This initial empirical evidence, even though restricted to a single site, was able to discern a measurable link between the occupation of different learning spaces and an impact on student learning experiences, engagement and academic outcomes in secondary schooling context.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using a New Learning Environment Questionnaire for Reflection in Teacher Action Research
    Aldridge, Jill M.
    Fraser, Barry J.
    Bell, Lisa
    Dorman, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2012, 23 (03) : 259 - 290
  • [2] [Anonymous], STUDENTS LEARN REFOR
  • [3] Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA
    Baguley, Thom
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 44 (01) : 158 - 175
  • [4] A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils' learning
    Barrett, Peter
    Zhang, Yufan
    Moffat, Joanne
    Kobbacy, Khairy
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 59 : 678 - 689
  • [5] Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century?
    Benade, Leon
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2017, 49 (08) : 796 - 807
  • [6] Blackmore J., 2011, RES CONNECTION BUILT
  • [7] Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning
    Brooks, D. Christopher
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 42 (05) : 719 - 726
  • [8] Byers, 2017, TYPE USE INNOVATIVE
  • [9] Byers T., 2014, CURRICULUM TEACHING, V29, P5, DOI [10.7459/ct/29.1.02, DOI 10.7459/CT/29.1.02]
  • [10] Byers T., 2016, The Translational Design of Schools, P215