Application of three-dimensional digital models for the morphometric analysis of predentition plasters: accuracy and precision

被引:0
作者
Kaihara, Y. [1 ]
Katayama, A. [2 ]
Iwamae, S. [3 ]
Kihara, T. [2 ]
Ono, K. [2 ]
Kurose, M. [2 ]
Amano, H. [4 ]
Nikawa, H. [2 ]
Kozai, K. [5 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Hiroshima Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat Dent, Hiroshima, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Div Oral Hlth Sci, Dept Oral Biol & Engn, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Satoko Dent Clin, Saitama, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Maxillofacial Funct Dev Div Oral Hlth Sci, Hiroshima, Japan
[5] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Paediat Dent, Div Cervicognathostomatol, Hiroshima, Japan
关键词
Morphometric analysis; Plaster models; Predentition period; Threedimensional digital models; ORTHODONTIC MODELS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim This study aimed to test the accuracy and precision of measurements of three-dimensional (3D) digital models from the pre-dentition period using a noncontact 3D measurement system (3D scanner) versus the gold standard method of direct measurements using a digital caliper on plaster models. Materials and methods Ten pairs of plaster models were obtained from children during the predentition period. Linear measurements were performed using both methods. Three operators were trained in the use of both methods for this study. Measurements were performed with a minimum 2-week interval between measurements in a randomly chosen order. Results The mean difference between the measured values using the two methods was <0.2 mm for each measurement. There was no linearity in the measurements using pre-dentition digital models. An ANOVA Gage R&R analysis revealed that there was no significant operator difference (P < 0.307). The rate of variation of the 3D scanner over the total variation was 2.8%. The ICC was 0.982 (P < 0.001), suggesting excellent interoperator agreement. Conclusion The results suggest that measurements of digital 3D pre-dentition models are highly accurate and precise, and also comparable to measurements using the gold standard method.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 366
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Digital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they? [J].
Abizadeh, Neilufar ;
Moles, David R. ;
O'Neill, Julian ;
Noar, Joseph H. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 39 (03) :151-159
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ORTODONCJA WSPOLCZES
[3]   Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study [J].
Asquith, Jennifer ;
Gillgrass, Toby ;
Mossey, Peter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2007, 29 (05) :517-522
[4]  
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG), 2002, AIAG MEAS SYST AN MS
[5]  
Bell A, 2003, J Orthod, V30, P219, DOI 10.1093/ortho/30.3.219
[6]  
Bevilacqua M., 2011, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, V7, P410, DOI 10.1504/IJPQM.2011.040542
[7]   Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity [J].
Bootvong, K. ;
Liu, Z. ;
McGrath, C. ;
Haegg, U. ;
Wong, Ricky W. K. ;
Bendeus, M. ;
Yeung, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2010, 32 (05) :589-595
[8]  
Dalstra M, 2009, J ORTHOD, V36, P36, DOI 10.1179/14653120722905
[9]  
Kaihara Y, 2014, EUR J PAEDIATR DENT, V15, P137
[10]  
Kaihara Y, 1998, JAPANESE J PEDIAT DE, V36, P839