Psychological experiences of healthcare professionals in Sri Lanka during COVID-19

被引:19
作者
Perera, Bilesha [1 ]
Wickramarachchi, Bimba [2 ]
Samanmalie, Champika [3 ]
Hettiarachchi, Manjula [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ruhuna, Fac Med, Dept Community Med, Galle, Sri Lanka
[2] Univ Ruhuna, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Galle, Sri Lanka
[3] Minist Hlth & Indigenous Med Serv, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[4] Univ Ruhuna, Fac Med, Nucl Med Unit, Galle, Sri Lanka
关键词
COVID-19; Healthcare professionals; Psychological health; Stigmatization; Self-confidence; Sri Lanka; PROVIDERS; EPIDEMIC; IMPACT; CHINA;
D O I
10.1186/s40359-021-00526-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: The upsurge of COVID-19 has caused numerous psycho-social challenges for healthcare professionals because of its ability to spread rapidly in the community and high mortality rate. The seriousness of the disease has led many healthcare professionals plagued by stigma as well as discrimination. In this study, depressive symptomatology, levels of anxiety, and related psychosocial and occupational factors experienced by healthcare professionals in Sri Lanka during COVID-19 were investigated. Methods: A total of 512 healthcare professionals were surveyed using an online survey. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised-10, and psychosocial and occupational factors predictive of depression and anxiety were included in the survey questionnaire. Logistic regression determined the factors associated with the presence of depressive symptoms and anxiety. Results: Results showed that elevated depressive symptoms and anxiety were experienced by 53.3% and 51.3%, respectively, of the participants. No differences in the prevalence of elevated depressive symptoms and anxiety were found between those who were exposed and non-exposed to COVID-19 confirmed or suspected patients. Having a fear of being infected with COVID-19 and spreading it among family members were associated with increased risk of depression. Among those exposed to COVID-19 confirmed or suspected patients, poor occupational safety (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.25-3.39), stigmatization (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.29-3.72), and heavy workload (OR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.53-3.92) were associated with increased risk of elevated depressive symptoms, whilst poor self-confidence (OR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.56-4.09) and heavy workload (OR = 1.94. 95% CI 1.22-3.12) were associated with increased risk of anxiety. Conclusions: Fear of being infected and distress caused by fear of spreading it among family members, stigmatization, poor self-confidence, poor occupational safety and heavy workload are vital risk factors that need to be considered in future psychological support services designed for the healthcare professionals in unprecedented outbreaks like COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Alharthy Nesrin, 2017, Int J Appl Basic Med Res, V7, P150, DOI 10.4103/2229-516X.212963
  • [2] Exploring the experiences of healthcare providers who survived MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia
    Almutairi, Adel F.
    Adlan, Abdallah A.
    Balkhy, Hanan H.
    Abbas, Oraynab A.
    Clark, Alexander M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 11 (02) : 187 - 191
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, LANCET, V395, P922, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30644-9
  • [4] Psychological Impact and Coping Strategies of Frontline Medical Staff in Hunan Between January and March 2020 During the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei, China
    Cai, Haozheng
    Tu, Baoren
    Ma, Jing
    Chen, Limin
    Fu, Lei
    Jiang, Yongfang
    Zhuang, Quan
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2020, 26
  • [5] Psychosocial aspects of the Tsunami
    Carballo, M
    Heal, B
    Hernandez, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2005, 98 (09) : 396 - 399
  • [6] Charities Aid Foundation, 2019, World Giving Index: Ten Years of Giving Trends
  • [7] Dewage N, 2020, SRI LANKAN MED EXPER
  • [8] Dioso R., 2020, AM RES J EMERG INTEN, V1, P1
  • [9] Quick and easy self-rating of Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Validity of the Dutch web-based GAD-7, GAD-2 and GAD-SI
    Donker, Tara
    van Straten, Annemieke
    Marks, Isaac
    Cuijpers, Pim
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 188 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [10] Eaton WW., 2004, The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment, P363, DOI DOI 10.1037/T29280-000