Contact sensitivity to preservatives in the UK, 2004-2005: results of multicentre study

被引:57
作者
Jong, Cherng T. [1 ]
Statham, Barry N.
Green, Cathy M.
King, Codagh M.
Gawkrodger, David J.
Sansom, Jane E.
English, John S. C.
Wilkinson, S. Mark
Ormerod, Anthony D.
Chowdhury, Mahbub M. U.
机构
[1] Singleton Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Swansea SA2 8QA, W Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Dermatol, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[3] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Liverpool L7 8XP, Merseyside, England
[4] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Bristol Royal Infirm & Gen Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Bristol BS2 8HW, Avon, England
[6] Queens Med Ctr, Dept Dermatol, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[7] Gen Infirm, Dept Dermatol, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Dept Dermatol, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, Scotland
[9] Univ Wales Hosp, Welsh Inst Dermatol, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
关键词
biocide; preservative; sensitivity; (c) Blackwell Munksgaard; 2007;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01181.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Preservative sensitivity in the UK was last assessed in 2000. Given the changes in preservative usage, we have re-evaluated our patch test data in order to detect any changes in the trend of sensitization. The results of patch testing using the extended British Contact Dermatitis Society Standard series were collected from 9 dermatology centres in the UK. Positive reactions to each of 10 preservative allergens were captured together with the MOAHFLA indices for each centre. In total, 6958 patients were tested during the period 2004-2005. The current data were compared with previously published data. Formaldehyde and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methyl-isothiazolinone have the highest positivity rates at 2.0% and chloroxylenol the lowest at 0.2%. Parabens mix has the highest irritancy rate. Compared with the UK data in 2000, the positivity rate of imidazolidinyl urea (0.02 < P < 0.05) has significantly increased and that of methyldibromo glutaronitrile has significantly reduced (P < 0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 168
页数:4
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   The British standard series of contact dermatitis allergens: validation in clinical practice and value for clinical governance [J].
Britton, JER ;
Wilkinson, SM ;
English, JSC ;
Gawkrodger, DJ ;
Ormerod, AD ;
Sansom, JE ;
Shaw, S ;
Statham, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 148 (02) :259-264
[2]  
EDMAN B, 1985, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V13, P120
[3]   PATCH TESTING WITH PRESERVATIVES AT ST-JOHNS FROM 1982 TO 1993 [J].
JACOBS, MC ;
WHITE, IR ;
RYCROFT, RJG ;
TAUB, N .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 33 (04) :247-254
[4]   National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series - Population-adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK) [J].
Schnuch, A ;
Geier, J ;
Uter, W ;
Frosch, PJ ;
Lehmacher, W ;
Aberer, W ;
Agathos, M ;
Arnold, R ;
Fuchs, T ;
Laubstein, B ;
Lischka, G ;
Pietrzyk, PM ;
Rakoski, J ;
Richter, G ;
Rueff, F .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 37 (05) :200-209
[5]   Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe -: A 10-year overview (1991-2000) [J].
Wilkinson, JD ;
Shaw, S ;
Andersen, KE ;
Brandao, FM ;
Bruynzeel, DP ;
Bruze, M ;
Camarasa, JMG ;
Diepgen, TL ;
Ducombs, G ;
Frosch, PJ ;
Goossens, A ;
Lachappelle, JM ;
Lahti, A ;
Menné, T ;
Seidenari, S ;
Tosti, A ;
Wahlberg, JE .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 46 (04) :207-210