Audit Market Concentration, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China

被引:105
作者
Huang, Ting-Chiao [1 ]
Chang, Hsihui [2 ,3 ]
Chiou, Jeng-Ren [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Peking Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Tainan 701, Taiwan
来源
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY | 2016年 / 35卷 / 02期
关键词
audit market concentration; audit fees; audit quality; China; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY EXPERTISE; COMPETITION; SERVICES; COST; NONAUDIT; INCENTIVES; OFFICE; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.2308/ajpt-51299
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the effects of audit market concentration on audit fees and audit quality in China, where competition is intense and the legal environment is relatively weak compared with developed countries. Analyzing 12,334 firm-year observations for the period 2001 to 2011, we find a significant positive relation between concentration and audit fees. Path analysis shows that concentration improves client earnings quality and reduces the need for auditors to issue modified audit opinions through increased audit fees. Additional analysis indicates that the increased audit fees and client earnings quality resulting from increased concentration are associated with a lower likelihood of executives and auditors being sanctioned by regulators for audit failures. Together, our results suggest that concentration improves audit quality indirectly through increased audit fees and this positive indirect effect offsets the negative direct effect of concentration on audit quality. By separating the direct and the indirect effect of concentration on audit quality, our study would explain why previous studies that do not have a separation document mixed evidence. Our findings inform regulators that actions taken to eliminate the indirect effect of concentration, for example restricting the upper bound of audit fees, could produce unintended outcomes such as decreased audit quality.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 145
页数:25
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
*AM ASS, 2005, FUT ACC PROF AUD CON
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PROM EUR FRAM CORP S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, COMMUNICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES
[5]   The effect of Enron, Andersen, and Sarbanes-Oxley on the US market for audit services [J].
Asthana, Sharad ;
Balsam, Steven ;
Kim, Sungsoo .
ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 22 (01) :4-+
[6]   Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries [J].
Ball, R ;
Robin, A ;
Wu, JS .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2003, 36 (1-3) :235-270
[7]   Market structure and audit fees: A local analysis [J].
Bandyopadhyay, SP ;
Kao, JL .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2004, 21 (03) :529-561
[8]  
Basioudis I. G., 2007, WORKING PAPER
[9]   Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors' planning and pricing decisions [J].
Bedard, JC ;
Johnstone, KM .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (02) :277-304
[10]   Direct and Mediated Associations among Earnings Quality, Information Asymmetry, and the Cost of Equity [J].
Bhattacharya, Nilabhra ;
Ecker, Frank ;
Olsson, Per M. ;
Schipper, Katherine .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (02) :449-482