Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs

被引:6
作者
Chamberlain, Catherine [1 ]
Yore, Daniel [1 ]
Li, Hang [1 ]
Williams, Emily [1 ]
Oldenburg, Brian [1 ]
Oats, Jeremy [2 ]
McNamara, Bridgette [3 ]
Eades, Sandra [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Int Publ Hlth Unit, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Burnley, Vic 3121, Australia
[3] Baker IDI Heart & Diabet Inst, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
PIMA INDIAN WOMEN; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; HYPERGLYCEMIA; GUIDELINES; CONSENSUS; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-11-104
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes in pregnancy, which includes gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is associated with poor outcomes for both mother and infant during pregnancy, at birth and in the longer term. Recent international guidelines recommend changes to the current GDM screening criteria. While some controversy remains, there appears to be consensus that women at high risk of T2DM, including indigenous women, should be offered screening for GDM early in pregnancy, rather than waiting until 24-28 weeks as is current practice. A range of criteria should be considered before changing screening practice in a population sub-group, including: prevalence, current practice, acceptability and whether adequate treatment pathways and follow-up systems are available. There are also specific issues related to screening in pregnancy and indigenous populations. The evidence that these criteria are met for indigenous populations is yet to be reported. A range of study designs can be considered to generate relevant evidence for these issues, including epidemiological, observational, qualitative, and intervention studies, which are not usually included within a single systematic review. The aim of this paper is to describe the methods we used to systematically review studies of different designs and present the evidence in a pragmatic format for policy discussion. Methods/Design: The inclusion criteria will be broad to ensure inclusion of the critical perspectives of indigenous women. Abstracts of the search results will be reviewed by two persons; the full texts of all potentially eligible papers will be reviewed by one person, and 10% will be checked by a second person for validation. Data extraction will be standardised, using existing tools to identify risks for bias in intervention, measurement, qualitative studies and reviews; and adapting criteria for appraising risk for bias in descriptive studies. External validity (generalisability) will also be appraised. The main findings will be synthesised according to the criteria for population-based screening and summarised in an adapted "GRADE" tool. Discussion: This will be the first systematic review of all the published literature on diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women. The method provides a pragmatic approach for synthesizing relevant evidence from a range of study designs to inform the current policy discussion.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Type 2 diabetes in the young: The evolving epidemic - The International Diabetes Federation Consensus Workshop [J].
Alberti, G ;
Zimmet, P ;
Shaw, J ;
Bloomgarden, Z ;
Kaufman, F ;
Silink, M .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (07) :1798-1811
[2]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2012, DIABETES CARE, V35, pS64, DOI [10.2337/dc19-S002, 10.2337/dc12-S064, 10.2337/dc23-S002, 10.2337/dc09-S062, 10.2337/dc18-S002]
[3]  
Anderson I, 2008, POPULATIONS SPECIAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], STUDY DESIGNS
[5]  
[Anonymous], CRITICAL APPRAISAL C
[6]  
[Anonymous], CRITICAL APPRAISAL T
[7]  
[Anonymous], DIAGNOSTIC CRITICAL
[8]  
[Anonymous], GRADE APPROACH RATIN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, AUSTR HLTH 2010
[10]  
[Anonymous], Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Tools Checkliksts