Coffee farmers' incentives to comply with sustainability standards

被引:20
作者
Lemeilleur, Sylvaine [1 ]
Subervie, Julie [2 ]
Presoto, Anderson Edilson [3 ]
Souza Piao, Roberta [3 ]
Saes, Maria Sylvia M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Cooperat Int Rech Agron Dev, UMR MOISA, Paris, France
[2] INRA, UMR CEE M, Nantes, France
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Polytech Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Econ Adm & Accounting, Dept Business, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Voluntary sustainability standards; Certification; Coffee; Choice experiment; Brazil; pesticides; Compost; Erosion; MIXED LOGIT-MODELS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; PREFERENCES; DESIGN; CONTRACT; WILLINGNESS; SCHEMES; PAYMENTS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1108/JADEE-04-2019-0051
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper investigates the incentives to coffee farmers to participate in certification schemes that require improved agricultural practices. Design/methodology/approach The authors ran a choice experiment among 250 Brazilian coffee farmers in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Findings The authors' findings show that both cash and non-cash payments are likely to incentive farmers' participation in a certification scheme. Besides price premium, incentives as long-term contracts and provision of technical would encourage producers to adopt eco-certification schemes. Our results also suggest that non-cash payments may be appropriate substitutes to a price premium to some extent. Research limitations/implications The large coffee producers are over-represented in our sample compared to the population of Brazilian coffee farms. However, it seems reasonable to focus on these producers, as they are usually the ones who individually adopt strategies, since small farmers are induced by collective strategies (e.g. cooperatives). Social implications The result regarding technical assistance makes sense given that Brazilian farmers generally have poor access to rural extension services. Originality/value We contributed in the literature about adoption of sustainable agriculture practices analyzing the requirements and motivations for farmer participation in certification schemes. We also contribute private and public strategies to encourage the adoption of sustainable practices.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 383
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[2]  
[Anonymous], ORG STUDIES
[3]  
Arinloye DDAA, 2015, J FOOD PROD MARK, V21, P337, DOI 10.1080/10454446.2013.856052
[4]   Agrifood supply chain, private-sector standards, and farmers' health: evidence from Kenya [J].
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Mithoefer, Dagmar ;
Waibel, Hermann .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 (3-4) :251-263
[5]   Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. .
FOOD POLICY, 2008, 33 (04) :299-317
[6]   Evaluating farmers' likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands [J].
Beharry-Borg, Nesha ;
Smart, James C. R. ;
Termansen, Mette ;
Hubacek, Klaus .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2013, 13 (03) :633-647
[7]  
Blackman A., 2010, 1010 RFF EFD
[8]   Does eco-certification have environmental benefits? Organic coffee in Costa Rica [J].
Blackman, Allen ;
Naranjo, Maria A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 83 :58-66
[9]   Smallholder Farmers in the Speciality Coffee Industry: Opportunities, Constraints and the Businesses that are Making it Possible [J].
Borrella, Inma ;
Mataix, Carlos ;
Carrasco-Gallego, Ruth .
IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2015, 46 (03) :29-44
[10]   Eco-labelled food products: what are consumers paying for? [J].
Bougherara, Douadia ;
Combris, Pierre .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 36 (03) :321-341