Who is the key worker in palliative home care?

被引:28
作者
Brogaard, Trine [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Anders Bonde
Sokolowski, Ineta [1 ,2 ]
Olesen, Frede [1 ,2 ]
Neergaard, Mette Asbjorn [3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Res Unit Gen Practice, Dept Publ Hlth, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Dept Family Med, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Palliat Team, Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
Denmark; organisation and administration; palliative care; patient care; primary health care; EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL; CANCER-PATIENTS; HEART-FAILURE; OF-LIFE; GPS; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRAJECTORIES; PERSPECTIVES; COMMUNITY; DELIVER;
D O I
10.3109/02813432.2011.603282
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. Palliative home care involves coordination of care between the professionals involved. The NICE guideline on supportive and palliative care (UK) recommends that teams, regardless of their base, should promote continuity for patients. This may involve nomination of a coordinating "key worker". This study aimed to explore who acts as key worker and who ought to take on this role in the views of patients, relatives, and primary care professionals. Furthermore, it aimed to explore the level of agreement on this issue between study participants. Design. Interview and questionnaire study. Setting. Former County of Aarhus, Denmark (2008-2009). Subjects. Ninety-six terminally ill cancer patients, their relatives, general practitioners (GPs), and community nurses (CNs). Main outcome measures. Actual key worker as valued by patients, relatives, and primary care professionals; ideal key worker as valued by patients and relatives. Results. Patients, relatives, GPs, and CNs most often saw themselves as having been the key worker. When asked about the ideal key worker, most patients (29%; 95% CI: 18; 42) and relatives (32%; 95% CI: 22; 45) pointed to the GP. Using patients' views as reference, we found very limited agreement with relatives (47.7%; k = 0.05), with GPs (30.4%; k = 0.01) and with CNs (25.0%; k = 0.04). Agreement between patients and relatives on the identity of the ideal key worker was of a similar dimension (29.6%; k = 0.11). Conclusion. Poor agreement between patients, relatives, and professionals on actual and ideal key worker emphasizes the need for matching expectations and clear communication about task distribution in palliative home care.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Why are some patients in treatment for advanced cancer reluctant to consult their GP?
    Aabom, Birgit
    Pfeiffer, Per
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2009, 27 (01) : 58 - 62
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, Stata Statistical Software
  • [3] Interdisciplinary cooperation of GPs in palliative care at home: A nationwide survey in the Netherlands
    Borgsteede, Sander D.
    Deliens, Luc
    Van Der Wal, Gerrit
    Francke, Anneke L.
    Stalman, Wim A. B.
    Van Ejjk, Jacques T. M.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2007, 25 (04) : 226 - 231
  • [4] Borgsteede SD, 2006, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V56, P20
  • [5] Making sure services deliver for people with advanced heart failure: a longitudinal qualitative study of patients, family carers, and health professionals
    Boyd, Kirsty J.
    Worth, Allison
    Kendall, Marilyn
    Pratt, Rebekah
    Hockley, Jo
    Denvir, Martin
    Murray, Scott A.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 23 (08) : 767 - 776
  • [6] End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying
    Chan, Raymond J.
    Webster, Joan
    Bowers, Alison
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (02):
  • [7] *DAN COLL GEN PRAC, 2004, PALL PRIM
  • [8] *DAN NAT BOARD HLT, 2009, PAKK KRAEFT, P9
  • [9] Special not different: General practitioners' accounts of their care of dying people
    Field, D
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (09) : 1111 - 1120
  • [10] The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care
    Groenvold, M
    Petersen, MA
    Aaronson, NK
    Arraras, JI
    Blazeby, JM
    Bottomley, A
    Fayers, PM
    de Graeff, A
    Hammerlid, E
    Kaasa, S
    Sprangers, MAG
    Bjorner, JB
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (01) : 55 - 64