Impact of (k,t) sampling on DCE MRI tracer kinetic parameter estimation in digital reference objects

被引:11
作者
Bliesener, Yannick [1 ]
Lingala, Sajan G. [1 ]
Haldar, Justin P. [1 ]
Nayak, Krishna S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Ming Hsieh Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
brain tumor; data sampling; digital reference objects; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; CONTRAST-ENHANCED-MRI; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; SCAN TIME; T-1; ACQUISITION; SELECTION; RECONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; PERMEABILITY; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.28024
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of (k,t) data sampling on the variance of tracer-kinetic parameter (TK) estimation in high-resolution whole-brain dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) using digital reference objects. We study this in the context of TK model constraints, and in the absence of other constraints. Methods: Three anatomically and physiologically realistic brain-tumor digital reference objects were generated. Data sampling strategies included uniform and variable density; zone-based, lattice, pseudo-random, and pseudo-radial; with 50-time frames and 4-fold to 25-fold undersampling. In all cases, we assume a fully sampled first time frame, and prior knowledge of the arterial input function. TK parameters were estimated by indirect estimation (i.e., image-time-series reconstruction followed by model fitting), and direct estimation from the under-sampled data. We evaluated methods based on the Cramer-Rao bound and Monte-Carlo simulations, over the range of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) seen in clinical brain DCE-MRI. Results: Lattice-based sampling provided the lowest SDs, followed by pseudo-random, pseudo-radial, and zone-based. This ranking was consistent for the Patlak and extended Tofts model. Pseudo-random sampling resulted in 19% higher averaged SD compared to lattice-based sampling. Zone-based sampling resulted in substantially higher SD at undersampling factors above 10. CRB analysis showed only a small difference between uniform and variable density for both lattice-based and pseudo-random sampling up to undersampling factors of 25. Conclusion: Lattice sampling provided the lowest SDs, although the differences between sampling schemes were not substantial at low undersampling factors. The differences between lattice-based and pseudo-random sampling strategies with both uniform and variable density were within the range of error induced by other sources, at up to 25-fold undersampling.
引用
收藏
页码:1625 / 1639
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Patient-adapted reconstruction and acquisition dynamic imaging method (PARADIGM) for MRI [J].
Aggarwal, Nitin ;
Bresler, Yoram .
INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2008, 24 (04)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, DCE MRI QUANT PROF Q
[3]   Accuracy, repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T1 quantification methods used for DCE-MRI: Results from a multicenter phantom study [J].
Bane, Octavia ;
Hectors, Stefanie J. ;
Wagner, Mathilde ;
Arlinghaus, Lori L. ;
Aryal, Madhava P. ;
Cao, Yue ;
Chenevert, Thomas L. ;
Fennessy, Fiona ;
Huang, Wei ;
Hylton, Nola M. ;
Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree ;
Keenan, Kathryn E. ;
Malyarenko, Dariya I. ;
Mulkern, Robert V. ;
Newitt, David C. ;
Russek, Stephen E. ;
Stupic, Karl F. ;
Tudorica, Alina ;
Wilmes, Lisa J. ;
Yankeelov, Thomas E. ;
Yen, Yi-Fei ;
Boss, Michael A. ;
Taouli, Bachir .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 79 (05) :2564-2575
[4]   Optimal acquisition and modeling parameters for accurate assessment of low Ktrans blood-brain barrier permeability using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [J].
Barnes, Samuel R. ;
Ng, Thomas S. C. ;
Montagne, Axel ;
Law, Meng ;
Zlokovic, Berislav V. ;
Jacobs, Russell E. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2016, 75 (05) :1967-1977
[5]   The Cramr-Rao Bound for Estimating a Sparse Parameter Vector [J].
Ben-Haim, Zvika ;
Eldar, Yonina C. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 58 (06) :3384-3389
[6]   Creating an anthropomorphic digital MR phantom-an extensible tool for comparing and evaluating quantitative imaging algorithms [J].
Bosca, Ryan J. ;
Jackson, Edward F. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (02) :974-982
[7]   Controlled aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA) [J].
Breuer, FA ;
Blaimer, M ;
Mueller, MF ;
Seiberlich, N ;
Heidemann, RM ;
Griswold, MA ;
Jakob, PM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2006, 55 (03) :549-556
[9]   FEATURE-RECOGNIZING MRI [J].
CAO, Y ;
LEVIN, DN .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (03) :305-317
[10]   The Promise of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging in Radiation Therapy [J].
Cao, Yue .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) :147-156