Rural access to electricity and welfare outcomes in Rwanda: Addressing issues of transitional heterogeneities and between and within gender disparities

被引:7
作者
Adom, Philip Kofi [1 ]
Nsabimana, Aimable [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ghana Inst Management & Publ Adm GIMPA, Dept Dev Policy, Sch Publ Serv & Governance, Accra, Ghana
[2] Rwanda Polytech, Deputy Vice Chancellor Adm & Finance, Kigali, Rwanda
[3] Univ Rwanda, Dept Econ, Kigali, Rwanda
关键词
Rural electrification; Gender; Heterogeneities; Vertical and horizontal changes; Welfare; Rwanda; WATER CONSERVATION; SELECTION BIAS; ELECTRIFICATION; IMPACTS; TECHNOLOGY; EMPLOYMENT; CHILDREN; FARMERS; INCOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101333
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The literature on the impact of electricity access are generally inconclusive. Potential causes include geographical differences, limited external validity (due to the focus on small-scale projects) and self-selection bias (due to not accounting for observed and unobserved heterogeneities) of some studies. Moreover, a large part of the literature on energy-gender nexus addresses between-gender instead of within-gender disparity, which is considered relevant because socio-economic characteristics do differ within a particular gender group. We address some of these concerns in the literature, using the endogenous switching regression (as identifying strategy) and the Rwanda national fifth Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey data of 2016/2017 to examine electricity adoption decision and impact of electrification on welfare outcomes in rural Rwanda. We find that having access to electricity impacts positively on equivalised consumption and labour force participation by 3.097 percent and 22 more days, respectively. We find significant positive transitional heterogeneity effects, suggesting that unobserved factors do inflate the estimated impacts. Further, the result reveals significant male - female gap (both in terms of vertical and horizontal changes) in the impact of electrification on labour force participation and equivalised consumption expenditure. We discuss the policy implications. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The Adoption and Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Technology: An Endogenous Switching Regression Application [J].
Abdulai, Awudu ;
Huffman, Wallace .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2014, 90 (01) :26-43
[2]  
ADB, 2019, IMP EV EN INT REV EV
[3]  
Adu G., 2018, Powering the Powerless: The Economic Impact of Rural Electrification in Ghana
[4]  
African Development Bank, 2020, AFR EC OUTL 2020 DEV, P206
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, DOI DOI 10.1177/089443938700500215
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, World Bank Data
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Household cookstoves, environment, health, and climate change: A new look at an old problem
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 11 C AFD PROPARCO EU
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Gender Equity as Smart Economics: A World Bank Group Gender Action Plan
[10]  
Barkat Abul., 2002, Economic and Social Impact Evaluation Study of the Rural Electrification Program in Bangladesh