Enhancing feasibility: Incorporating a socio-ecological systems framework into restoration planning

被引:54
作者
Budiharta, Sugeng [1 ,2 ]
Meijaard, Erik [1 ,3 ]
Wells, Jessie A. [1 ]
Abram, Nicola K. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Wilson, Kerrie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Australian Res Council, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Indonesian Inst Sci, Purwodadi Bot Garden, Jalan Surabaya Malang Km 65, Pasuruan 67163, East Java, Indonesia
[3] Borneo Futures Project, Country Woods 306,Jalan WR Supratman, Ciputat 15412, Tangerang, Indonesia
[4] Living Landscape Alliance, 5 Jupiter House,Calleva Pk, Reading RG7 8NN, Berks, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Forest landscape restoration; Feasibility; Social-ecological systems; Spatial prioritisation; Kalimantan; Indonesia; Tropical forest; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; OIL PALM; FOREST; REFORESTATION; KALIMANTAN; RATTAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forest restoration is the counterforce to deforestation. In many parts of the world it mitigates forest loss and degradation, but success rates vary. Socio-political variables are important predictors of effectiveness of restoration activities, indicating that restoration strategies need to be locally adapted. Yet, contextual assessments of the biophysical, social and political characteristics of forest restoration are rare. Here, we integrate a social-ecological systems framework with systematic decision-making to inform forest restoration planning. We illustrate this approach through a prioritization analysis in a community-based forest restoration context in Paser District, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. We compare the solutions of our integrated framework with those identified on the basis of biophysical criteria alone. We discover that incorporating a socio-political context alters the selection of priority areas. While the social feasibility and political permissibility can be enhanced, ecological benefits are likely to be reduced and/or opportunity costs of alternative land uses are to be increased. Our conceptual framework allows the appraisal of potential trade-offs between social and ecological outcomes of alternative options, and has the potential to evaluate the efficiency of existing policies. Empirical testing in a range of contexts is required to ensure broad applicability and transferability of our conceptual framework. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 92
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo [J].
Abram, Nicola K. ;
Meijaard, Erik ;
Ancrenaz, Marc ;
Runting, Rebecca K. ;
Wells, Jessie A. ;
Gaveau, David ;
Pellier, Anne-Sophie ;
Mengersen, Kerrie .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 7 :116-127
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, REGREENING BARE HILL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ITTO TECHNICAL SERIE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HARM WORLD SOIL DAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], STAT WORLDS FOR
[6]  
[Anonymous], SOILGRIDS AUT SYST G
[7]  
Baker S., 2013, Environmental Politics, V23, P509
[8]  
Bakker L., 2008, CAN WE GET HAK ULAYA
[9]   A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations [J].
Ban, Natalie C. ;
Mills, Morena ;
Tam, Jordan ;
Hicks, Christina C. ;
Klain, Sarah ;
Stoeckl, Natalie ;
Bottrill, Madeleine C. ;
Levine, Jordan ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Chan, Kai M. A. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (04) :194-202
[10]   The social ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries [J].
Basurto, Xavier ;
Gelcich, Stefan ;
Ostrom, Elinor .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (06) :1366-1380