Rate-based modelling of combined SO2 removal and NH3 recycling integrated with an aqueous NH3-based CO2 capture process

被引:69
作者
Li, Kangkang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Hai [1 ]
Qi, Guojie [3 ]
Feron, Paul [1 ]
Tade, Moses [2 ]
Yu, Jingwen [3 ]
Wang, Shujuan [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Energy Flagship, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ Technol Australia, Dept Chem Engn, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Thermal Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
CO2; capture; SO2; removal; NH3; recycling; Aqueous NH3; CHILLED AMMONIA PROCESS; SULFUR-DIOXIDE; CARBON CAPTURE; FLUE-GAS; SOLID PRECIPITATION; OXY-FUEL; ABSORPTION; TECHNOLOGIES; COMBUSTION; OXIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.060
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
To reduce the costs of controlling emissions from coal-fired power stations, we propose an advanced and effective process of combined SO2 removal and NH3 recycling, which can be integrated with the aqueous NH3-based CO2 capture process to simultaneously achieve SO2 and CO2 removal, NH3 recycling and flue gas cooling in one process. A rigorous, rate-based model for an NH3-CO2-SO2-H2O system was developed and used to simulate the proposed process. The model was thermodynamically and kinetically validated by experimental results from the open literature and pilot-plant trials, respectively. Under typical flue gas conditions, the proposed process has SO2 removal and NH3 reuse efficiencies of >99.9%. The process is strongly adaptable to different scenarios such as high SO2 levels in flue gas, high NH3 levels from the CO2 absorber and high flue gas temperatures, and has a low energy requirement. Because the process simplifies flue gas desulphurisation and resolves the problems of NH3 loss and SO2 removal, it could significantly reduce the cost of CO2 and SO2 capture by aqueous NH3. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 77
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Approximate high flux corrections for multicomponent mass transfer models and some explicit methods [J].
Alopaeus, V ;
Aittamaa, J ;
Nordén, HV .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1999, 54 (19) :4267-4271
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, World Energy Outlook - Electricity Access Database
[3]  
Aspen Technology, 2010, RATE BASED MODEL
[4]  
Aspen Technology, 2010, ASPEN PHYS POPERY
[5]   Carbon capture and storage update [J].
Boot-Handford, M. E. ;
Abanades, J. C. ;
Anthony, E. J. ;
Blunt, M. J. ;
Brandani, S. ;
Mac Dowell, N. ;
Fernandez, J. R. ;
Ferrari, M. -C. ;
Gross, R. ;
Hallett, J. P. ;
Haszeldine, R. S. ;
Heptonstall, P. ;
Lyngfelt, A. ;
Makuch, Z. ;
Mangano, E. ;
Porter, R. T. J. ;
Pourkashanian, M. ;
Rochelle, G. T. ;
Shah, N. ;
Yao, J. G. ;
Fennell, P. S. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2014, 7 (01) :130-189
[6]   Abatement of ammonia and amines from waste gases: a summary [J].
Busca, G ;
Pistarino, C .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2003, 16 (02) :157-163
[7]   Mass transfer (absorption) coefficients - Prediction from data on great transfer and fluid friction [J].
Chilton, TH ;
Colburn, AP .
INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1934, 26 :1183-1187
[8]  
China National Bureau of Statistics China National Energy Administration, 2008, CHINA ENERGY STAT
[9]  
CSIRO, 2012, FINAL REPORT
[10]   Process simulation of CO2 capture with aqueous ammonia using the Extended UNIQUAC model [J].
Darde, Victor ;
Maribo-Mogensen, Bjorn ;
van Well, Willy J. M. ;
Stenby, Erling H. ;
Thomsen, Kaj .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 10 :74-87