The trend of the distribution of ectopic pregnancy sites and the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy

被引:20
作者
Tang, Panpan [1 ]
Li, Xiaomao [1 ]
Li, Wenwei [1 ]
Li, Yunhui [1 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
Yang, Yuebo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Gynecol Dept, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Ectopic pregnancy; Distribution; Trend; Tubal pregnancy; Caesarean scar pregnancy; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-022-01472-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Plain language summary Ectopic pregnancy occurs when a fertilized ovum implants outside the endometrium of the uterine cavity, which is a life-threatening occurrence and is an important cause of pregnancy-related mortality. With the increase in pelvic and intrauterine operations, the distribution of ectopic sites has been changing, but the variation has been insufficiently studied. To investigate the distribution of ectopic sites and its variation trend in depth, we collected the data of 3915 ectopic pregnancy cases from the third affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Through chi(2) test for trend, the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy showed an upward trend (P = 0.005). From 2012 to 2015 and 2016-2019, the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy increased from 5.74 to 11.81% (P < 0.001). As the increasing of the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy, the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy was analysed. A total of 72.78% (246/338) caesarean scar pregnancy patients had one caesarean delivery, 25.15% (85/338) had two caesarean deliveries, and 2.07% (7/338) had three caesarean deliveries. A total of 80.18% (271/338) had aborted before. The most common clinical manifestations were amenorrhea (98.52%), abdominal pain (25.74%) and vaginal bleeding (67.76%), the most common sign was uterine enlargement (46.75%). As the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy increases, the caesarean delivery rate should be decreased to decrease the morbidity of caesarean scar pregnancy. Background Ectopic pregnancy is a life-threatening occurrence and is an important cause of pregnancy-related mortality. We launched the study to investigate the distribution and its variation trend of the ectopic pregnancy sites and the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy, to provide information for further clinical practice. Methods A total of 3915 patients were included in our study to calculate the distribution of the implantation sites of ectopic pregnancies. Then, we performed a chi(2) test for trend and calculated the quantity of each type of ectopic pregnancy during 2012-2015 and 2016-2019 to analyse the variation trend. Results (1) The proportion of each site of ectopic pregnancy was as follows: tubal pregnancy (84.70%), ovarian pregnancy (1.56%), caesarean scar pregnancy (8.63%), abdominal pregnancy (0.61%), cornual pregnancy (2.68%), cervical pregnancy (0.49%), heterotopic pregnancy (0.43%). (2) Through the chi(2) test for trend, the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy showed an upward trend (P = 0.005). From 2012 to 2015 and 2016-2019, the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy increased from 5.74 to 11.81% (P < 0.001). (3) A total of 72.78% (246/338) caesarean scar pregnancy patients had one caesarean delivery, 25.15% (85/338) had two caesarean deliveries, and 2.07% (7/338) had three caesarean deliveries. A total of 80.18% (271/338) had aborted before. The most common clinical manifestations were amenorrhea (98.52%), abdominal pain (25.74%) and vaginal bleeding (67.76%), the most common sign was uterine enlargement (46.75%). Conclusion As the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy increases, the caesarean delivery rate should be decreased to decrease the morbidity of caesarean scar pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
ATRASH HK, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P333
[2]   Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases [J].
Bouyer, J ;
Coste, J ;
Fernandez, H ;
Pouly, JL ;
Job-Spira, N .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (12) :3224-3230
[3]   Uncommon Implantation Sites of Ectopic Pregnancy: Thinking beyond the Complex Adnexal Mass [J].
Chukus, Anjeza ;
Tirada, Nikki ;
Restrepo, Ricardo ;
Reddy, Neelima I. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2015, 35 (03) :946-959
[4]   Laparoscopic Management of Abdominal Pregnancy [J].
Cosentino, Francesco ;
Rossitto, Cristiano ;
Turco, Luigi Carlo ;
Alletti, Salvatore Gueli ;
Vascone, Carmine ;
Di Meglio, Lavinia ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Malzoni, Mario .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) :724-725
[5]   Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature [J].
Gao, Lufen ;
Huang, Zhongwei ;
Zhang, Xian ;
Zhou, Na ;
Huang, Xinke ;
Wang, Xiaoyu .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 200 :102-107
[6]   Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Incidence, and Recurrence Five-Year Experience at a Single Tertiary Care Referral Center [J].
Grechukhina, Olga ;
Deshmukh, Uma ;
Fan, Linda ;
Kohari, Katherine ;
Abdel-Razeq, Sonya ;
Bahtiyar, Mert Ozan ;
Sfakianaki, Anna K. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (05) :1285-1295
[7]   WHO analysis of causes of maternal death:: a systematic review [J].
Khan, KS ;
Wojdyla, D ;
Say, L ;
Gülmezoglu, AM ;
Van Look, PFA .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9516) :1066-1074
[8]   Cesarean scar pregnancy; Diagnosis and management between 2003 and 2015 in a single center [J].
Kim, So Yun ;
Yoon, So Ra ;
Kim, Mi Jung ;
Chung, Jin Hoon ;
Kim, Moon Young ;
Lee, Si Won .
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (05) :688-691
[9]   Trends in pelvic inflammatory disease emergency department visits, United States, 2006-2013 [J].
Kreisel, Kristen ;
Flagg, Elaine W. ;
Torrone, Elizabeth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) :117.e1-117.e10
[10]   Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2018 [J].
Li, Hong-tian ;
Hellerstein, Susan ;
Zhou, Yu-bo ;
Liu, Jian-meng ;
Blustein, Jan .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (01) :89-91