Soot microphysical effects on liquid clouds, a multi-model investigation

被引:47
作者
Koch, D. [1 ,2 ]
Balkanski, Y. [3 ]
Bauer, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Easter, R. C. [8 ]
Ferrachat, S. [4 ]
Ghan, S. J. [8 ]
Hoose, C. [7 ,10 ]
Iversen, T. [5 ]
Kirkevag, A. [5 ]
Kristjansson, J. E. [10 ]
Liu, X. [8 ]
Lohmann, U. [4 ]
Menon, S. [9 ]
Quaas, J. [6 ]
Schulz, M. [3 ,10 ]
Seland, O. [5 ]
Takemura, T. [11 ]
Yan, N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA
[3] Lab Sci Climat & Environm, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[4] ETH, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, Oslo, Norway
[6] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res, Karlsruhe, Germany
[8] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[9] Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley, CA USA
[10] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
[11] Kyushu Univ, Fukuoka 812, Japan
关键词
CLIMATE MODEL ECHAM5-HAM; GLOBAL CLIMATE; AEROSOL; PARAMETERIZATION; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT; AEROCOM;
D O I
10.5194/acp-11-1051-2011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We use global models to explore the microphysical effects of carbonaceous aerosols on liquid clouds. Although absorption of solar radiation by soot warms the atmosphere, soot may cause climate cooling due to its contribution to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and therefore cloud brightness. Six global models conducted three soot experiments; four of the models had detailed aerosol microphysical schemes. The average cloud radiative response to biofuel soot (black and organic carbon), including both indirect and semi-direct effects, is -0.11 Wm(-2), comparable in size but opposite in sign to the respective direct effect. In a more idealized fossil fuel black carbon experiment, some models calculated a positive cloud response because soot provides a deposition sink for sulfuric and nitric acids and secondary organics, decreasing nucleation and evolution of viable CCN. Biofuel soot particles were also typically assumed to be larger and more hygroscopic than for fossil fuel soot and therefore caused more negative forcing, as also found in previous studies. Diesel soot (black and organic carbon) experiments had relatively smaller cloud impacts with five of the models <+/- 0.06 Wm(-2) from clouds. The results are subject to the caveats that variability among models, and regional and interrannual variability for each model, are large. This comparison together with previously published results stresses the need to further constrain aerosol microphysical schemes. The non-linearities resulting from the competition of opposing effects on the CCN population make it difficult to extrapolate from idealized experiments to likely impacts of realistic potential emission changes.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1064
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Study of Microphysical Mechanisms for Correlation Patterns between Droplet Radius and Optical Thickness of Warm Clouds with a Spectral Bin Microphysics Cloud Model
    Suzuki, Kentaroh
    Nakajma, Teruyuki
    Nakajima, Takashi Y.
    Khain, Alexander P.
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2010, 67 (04) : 1126 - 1141
  • [32] The chaos in calibrating crop models: Lessons learned from a multi-model calibration exercise
    Wallach, Daniel
    Palosuo, Taru
    Thorburn, Peter
    Hochman, Zvi
    Gourdain, Emmanuelle
    Andrianasolo, Fety
    Asseng, Senthold
    Basso, Bruno
    Buis, Samuel
    Crout, Neil
    Dibari, Camilla
    Dumont, Benjamin
    Ferrise, Roberto
    Gaiser, Thomas
    Garcia, Cecile
    Gayler, Sebastian
    Ghahramani, Afshin
    Hiremath, Santosh
    Hoek, Steven
    Horan, Heidi
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    Huang, Mingxia
    Jabloun, Mohamed
    Jansson, Per-Erik
    Jing, Qi
    Justes, Eric
    Kersebaum, Kurt Christian
    Klosterhalfen, Anne
    Launay, Marie
    Lewan, Elisabet
    Luo, Qunying
    Maestrini, Bernardo
    Mielenz, Henrike
    Moriondo, Marco
    Zadeh, Hasti Nariman
    Padovan, Gloria
    Olesen, Jorgen Eivind
    Poyda, Arne
    Priesack, Eckart
    Pullens, Johannes Wilhelmus Maria
    Qian, Budong
    Schuetze, Niels
    Shelia, Vakhtang
    Souissi, Amir
    Specka, Xenia
    Srivastava, Amit Kumar
    Stella, Tommaso
    Streck, Thilo
    Trombi, Giacomo
    Wallor, Evelyn
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2021, 145
  • [33] NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF TRANSIENT SOOT EVOLUTION PROCESSES IN AN AERO-ENGINE MODEL COMBUSTOR
    Eberle, Christian
    Gerlinger, Peter
    Geigle, Klaus Peter
    Aigner, Manfred
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 187 (12) : 1841 - 1866
  • [34] 3-D model simulations of dynamical and microphysical interactions in pyroconvective clouds under idealized conditions
    Reutter, P.
    Trentmann, J.
    Seifert, A.
    Neis, P.
    Su, H.
    Chang, D.
    Herzog, M.
    Wernli, H.
    Andreae, M. O.
    Poeschl, U.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2014, 14 (14) : 7573 - 7583
  • [35] Multi-model MJO forecasting during DYNAMO/CINDY period
    Fu, Xiouhua
    Lee, June-Yi
    Hsu, Pang-Chi
    Taniguchi, Hiroshi
    Wang, Bin
    Wang, Wanqiu
    Weaver, Scott
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 41 (3-4) : 1067 - 1081
  • [36] Multi-model study of HTAP II on sulfur and nitrogen deposition
    Tan, Jiani
    Fu, Joshua S.
    Dentener, Frank
    Sun, Jian
    Emmons, Louisa
    Tilmes, Simone
    Sudo, Kengo
    Flemming, Johannes
    Jonson, Jan Eiof
    Gravel, Sylvie
    Bian, Huisheng
    Davila, Yanko
    Henze, Daven K.
    Lund, Marianne T.
    Kucsera, Tom
    Takemura, Toshihiko
    Keating, Terry
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (09) : 6847 - 6866
  • [37] Multi-model comparison of urban heat island modelling approaches
    Karlicky, Jan
    Huszar, Peter
    Halenka, Tomas
    Belda, Michal
    Zak, Michal
    Pisoft, Petr
    Miksovsky, Jiri
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (14) : 10655 - 10674
  • [38] An application of a planning and scheduling multi-model approach in the chemical industry
    Artiba, A
    Riane, F
    COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 1998, 36 (03) : 209 - 229
  • [39] Multi-model comparison of a major flood in the groundwater-fed basin of the Somme River (France)
    Habets, F.
    Gascoin, S.
    Korkmaz, S.
    Thiery, D.
    Zribi, M.
    Amraoui, N.
    Carli, M.
    Ducharne, A.
    Leblois, E.
    Ledoux, E.
    Martin, E.
    Noilhan, J.
    Ottle, C.
    Viennot, P.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (01) : 99 - 117
  • [40] NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF SOOT FORMATION IN TURBULENT DIFFUSION FLAMES USING MOSS-BROOKES MODEL
    Reddy, Mannedhar
    De, Ashoke
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME GAS TURBINE INDIA CONFERENCE, 2014, 2014,