Case Study: Feasibility Analysis of Close-in Proximity Operations Using Angles-only Navigation

被引:4
作者
Li, Feng [1 ]
Cao, Xibin [1 ]
You, Yue [2 ]
Zhang, Jinxiu [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Res Ctr Satellite Technol, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
[2] Naval Res Acad, Beijing 100161, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Angles-Only Navigation; Close-in Proximity Operations; Square Root Unscented Kalman Filter (SRUKF); UNSCENTED KALMAN FILTER; RELATIVE NAVIGATION; OBSERVABILITY; CONCLUSIONS; STATE;
D O I
10.2322/tjsass.63.31
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The feasibility of angles-only navigation (AON)-based close-in proximity operation is studied for application to upcoming small satellite-based uncooperative rendezvous missions. For the relative motion equations described by Yamanaka-Ankersen, the Square-Root Unscented Kalman Filter (SRUKF) is adapted for relative position estimations, considering low-volume/mass, lower-power, simple optical/infrared instruments together with Lidar measurements. Considering simplicity and achievements in engineering, the multi-pulse glideslope guidance law is utilized. Using a linear covariance technique, a complete set of analytical functions are deduced for closed-loop true dispersions and estimated dispersion analysis. Monte Carlo simulation proves the offset observation model proposed provides a good solution for the range-observability dilemma: the range estimation error decreases from an initial decameter-level to a final decimeter-level. Two proximity operation mission trajectories are designed: direct v-bar quasi-linear glide approach for robotic arm capture or net capture, and glide approach (i.e., circumnavigate-glide approach for capture with attitude requirement). Using a well-designed relative approaching guidance profile, the camera operational range can be extended. This enables the operation time of the Lidar to be shortened, or even replaced by an optimal/infrared camera. This is very helpful in saving mass and power for the chaser. The variable-structure SRUKF proposed leads to a more robust trajectory: true dispersion is improved by two orders in the 100m range, and more accurate covariance prediction (i.e., all sampled trajectories are inside the ellipse) when compared to the standard SRUKF. The analysis method proposed, which could raise analytical closed-loop linear covariance, is applicable for onboard maneuver planning and real-time closed-loop control error estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Alfriend K., 2009, SPACECRAFT FORMATION, V2, P105
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, P AER INT S AER DEF
  • [3] Bodin P, 2012, ADV ASTRONAUT SCI, V144, P441
  • [4] Chari R. J., 2001, THESIS
  • [5] Noncooperative Rendezvous Using Angles-Only Optical Navigation: System Design and Flight Results
    D'Amico, S.
    Ardaens, J. -S.
    Gaias, G.
    Benninghoff, H.
    Schlepp, B.
    Jorgensen, J. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2013, 36 (06) : 1576 - 1595
  • [6] Results of PRISMA/FFIORD extended mission and applicability to future formation flying and active debris removal missions
    Delpech, Michel
    Berges, Jean-Claude
    Karlsson, Thomas
    Malbet, Fabien
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPACE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 1 (04) : 382 - 409
  • [7] Space debris removal by ground- based lasers: main conclusions of the European project CLEANSPACE
    Esmiller, Bruno
    Jacquelard, Christophe
    Eckel, Hans-Albert
    Wnuk, Edwin
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2014, 53 (31) : I45 - I54
  • [8] Analysis of the relative attitude estimation and control problem for satellite inspection and orbital rendezvous
    Geller, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 55 (02) : 195 - 214
  • [9] Linear covariance techniques for orbital rendezvous analysis and autonomous onboard mission planning
    Geller, David K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2006, 29 (06) : 1404 - 1414
  • [10] Analytic Optimal Observability Maneuvers for In-Orbit Bearings-Only Rendezvous
    Grzymisch, Jonathan
    Fichter, Walter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2014, 37 (05) : 1658 - 1664