Yield, quality and stress tolerance of barley mixtures in central Alberta

被引:25
作者
Jedel, PE
Helm, JH
Burnett, PA
机构
[1] Alberta Agr Crop Res, Field Crop Dev Ctr, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W8, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge Res Ctr, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
关键词
Hordeum vulgare L; mixtures; yield; quality; stress tolerance;
D O I
10.4141/P97-137
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Intraspecific mixtures may be a means of enhancing the genetic variability of modern crops while retaining the advantages of yield, quality, and stress tolerance of modern cultivars. Two- and three-way barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mixtures of the cultivars Abee, Noble, Tukwa and Virden, were studied at Botha, Lacombe and Olds, Alberta, from 1992 to 1994. Treatments consisted of the four cultivars as monocrops and in 6 two-way and 3 three-way mixtures grown at a seeding rate of 250 seeds m(-2). Tukwa as a monocrop had the highest rank and best stability for grain yield of all the treatments. Grain yields of the mixtures usually fell between the yields of the respective monocrops and were often better than the weighted mean yield of the monocrops indicating that many mixtures were more effective at using resources than the monocrops. Of the mixtures, Tukwa:Noble, Tukwa:Abee:Virden and Noble:Virden had the best rankings and stability for grain yield. Test weights, kernel weights, percent thins, lodging, disease incidence and protein content of the mixtures were intermediate to those of the monocrops. Mixtures containing the two-rowed cultivar Abee had higher test weight and protein content than mixtures composed of only six-rowed cultivars. Lodging and disease ratings were lower for the mixtures composed of only six-rowed cultivars than those with Abee. In these intraspecific barley mixtures, Virden was often the most competitive cultivar while Tukwa was the least. Competitive ability was not associated with yield potential, tillering, or row-type.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 436
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   NATURAL-SELECTION IN A MIXTURE OF 8 BARLEY VARIETIES, GROWN IN 6 SUCCESSIVE YEARS .1. COMPETITION BETWEEN VARIETIES [J].
BLIJENBURG, JG ;
SNEEP, J .
EUPHYTICA, 1975, 24 (02) :305-315
[2]   A COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE OF HOMOGENEOUS AND HETEROGENEOUS BARLEY POPULATIONS [J].
CLAY, RE ;
ALLARD, RW .
CROP SCIENCE, 1969, 9 (04) :407-&
[3]  
CZEMBOR HJ, 1996, INT OAT C 7 INT BARL, V2, P611
[4]  
CZEMBOR HJ, 1991, BARLEY GENETICS 6, V1, P396
[5]   COMPARATIVE BEHAVIOR OF 3 WHEAT CULTIVARS AND THEIR MIXTURE IN INDIA, NEPAL AND PAKISTAN [J].
DUBIN, HJ ;
WOLFE, MS .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1994, 39 (2-3) :71-83
[6]  
DZIAMBA S, 1992, B IHAR, V181, P177
[7]   PLANT COMPETITION AND DISEASE IN GENETICALLY DIVERSE WHEAT POPULATIONS [J].
FINCKH, MR ;
MUNDT, CC .
OECOLOGIA, 1992, 91 (01) :82-92
[8]   PROCESSES DETERMINING INTERCROP PRODUCTIVITY AND YIELDS OF COMPONENT CROPS [J].
FUKAI, S ;
TRENBATH, BR .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1993, 34 (3-4) :247-271
[9]  
Harrabi M. M., 1986, Rachis, Barley and Wheat Newsletter, V5, P11
[10]   LODGING EFFECTS ON A SEMIDWARF AND 2 STANDARD BARLEY CULTIVARS [J].
JEDEL, PE ;
HELM, JH .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (01) :158-161