Ultrasound-guided interventions with augmented reality in situ visualisation: a proof-of-mechanism phantom study

被引:30
作者
Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A. [1 ]
Bay, Till [2 ]
Rosskopf, Andrea B. [1 ]
Spirig, Jose M. [3 ]
Wanivenhaus, Florian [3 ]
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A. [1 ]
Farshad, Mazda [3 ]
机构
[1] Balgrist Univ Hosp, Radiol, Forchstr 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Incremed AG, Lenghalde 5, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Forchstr 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Augmented reality; Holography; Phantoms (imaging); Punctures; Ultrasonography; IMAGE OVERLAY TECHNOLOGY; MR; ARTHROGRAPHY; INJECTION; GUIDANCE; FLUOROSCOPY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-019-0129-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Ultrasound (US) images are currently displayed on monitors, and their understanding needs good orientation skills. Direct overlay of US images onto the according anatomy is possible with augmented reality (AR) technologies. Our purpose was to explore the performance of US-guided needle placement with and without AR in situ US viewing. Methods Three untrained operators and two experienced radiologists performed 200 US-guided punctures: 100 with and 100 without AR in situ US. The punctures were performed in two different phantoms, a leg phantom with soft tissue lesions and a vessel phantom. Time to puncture and number of needle passes were recorded for each puncture. Data are reported as median [range] according to their non-normal distribution. Results AR in situ US resulted in reduced time (median [range], 13 s [3-101] versus 14 s [3-220]) and number of needle passes (median [range], 1 [1-4] versus 1 [1-8]) compared to the conventional technique. The initial gap in performance of untrained versus experienced operators with the conventional US (time, 21.5 s [3-220] versus 10.5 s [3-94] and needle passes 1 [1-8] versus 1 [1, 2]) was reduced to 12.5 s [3-101] versus 13 s [3-100] and 1 [1-4] versus 1 [1-4] when using AR in situ US, respectively. Conclusion AR in situ US could be a potential breakthrough in US applications by simplifying operator's spatial orientation and reducing experience-based differences in performance of US-guided interventions. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary phantom results.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Augmented Reality-Guided Lumbar Facet Joint Injections [J].
Agten, Christoph A. ;
Dennler, Cyrill ;
Rosskopf, Andrea B. ;
Jaberg, Laurenz ;
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A. ;
Farshad, Mazda .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (08) :495-498
[2]   Intraoperative augmented reality with heads-up displays in maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review of the literature and a classification of relevant technologies [J].
Bosc, R. ;
Fitoussi, A. ;
Hersant, B. ;
Dao, T. -H. ;
Meningaud, J. -P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (01) :132-138
[3]   Augmented Reality Visualization Using Image Overlay Technology for MR-Guided Interventions Cadaveric Bone Biopsy at 1.5 T [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
McCarthy, Edward F. ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (06) :464-470
[4]   Augmented reality visualisation using an image overlay system for MR-guided interventions: technical performance of spine injection procedures in human cadavers at 1.5 Tesla [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) :235-245
[5]   Augmented Reality Visualization with Use of Image Overlay Technology for MR Imaging-guided Interventions: Assessment of Performance in Cadaveric Shoulder and Hip Arthrography at 1.5 T [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) :254-259
[6]   Augmented Reality Visualization With Image Overlay for MRI-Guided Intervention: Accuracy for Lumbar Spinal Procedures With a 1.5-T MRI System [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
Cho, Nathan B. ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (03) :W266-W273
[7]   Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support [J].
Harris, Paul A. ;
Taylor, Robert ;
Thielke, Robert ;
Payne, Jonathon ;
Gonzalez, Nathaniel ;
Conde, Jose G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) :377-381
[8]   Technical errors in MR arthrography [J].
Hodler, Juerg .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (01) :9-18
[9]   Ultrasound-guided injection for MR arthrography of the hip: comparison of two different techniques [J].
Kantarci, Fatih ;
Ozbayrak, Mustafa ;
Gulsen, Fatih ;
Gencturk, Mert ;
Botanlioglu, Huseyin ;
Mihmanli, Ismail .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01) :37-42
[10]   Fluoroscopy versus sonography for image guidance in peripheral MSK intervention [J].
Lopez-Ben, Robert ;
Coumas, James .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (12) :1721-1722