Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment Discontinuation: Commercial Clinical Trial Data From Four Cancer Types

被引:6
|
作者
King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L. [1 ]
Lederer, Nirosha Mahendraratnam [1 ]
Kim, Janice [2 ]
Nair, Abhilasha [2 ]
Horodniceanu, Erica [1 ]
Bhatnagar, Vishal [1 ]
Kluetz, Paul G. [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Oncol Ctr Excellence, Bldg 22,10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
cancer; clinical trials; patient-reported outcomes; regulatory; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.1279
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: How frequently patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are collected in commercial cancer clinical trials after treatment discontinuation and the quality of that data are poorly understood. We reviewed treatment discontinuation follow-up PRO data collection to learn about trials collecting these data and understand data quality. The review included 4 cancer types representing potential for long-(prostate cancer), medium -/long-(breast cancer), and short-term (pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma) follow-up owing to disease trajectory. Methods: We reviewed registration trials in US Food and Drug Administration databases between January 2010 and January 2019. Protocols were reviewed to determine whether PROs were collected and, if so, whether these included the follow-up phase. Clinical study reports were reviewed when follow-up PROs were collected to determine completion rates. Results were summarized using descriptive analyses. Results: Of the 46 trials containing PRO data, 46% had at least 1 follow-up PRO assessment. Follow-up schedules of assessment were wide ranging; the first assessment occurred between 30 days and 6 months after stopping treatment with follow-up for as long as 3 years. PRO completion rates were reported in 57% of 21 trials; at the first follow-up assessment, completion rates for the treatment arm ranged from 38% to 91% and from 41% to 100% in the control arm. Conclusions: The quality of the follow-up PRO data, based on completion rates, was variable, as was the duration of follow-up. A clear research objective should be developed for follow-up PRO data, accounting for patient burden. If PRO data are collected, monitoring should be implemented to improve completion because poor completion limits data use in the benefit-risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1307
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring the Effects of Yoga Therapy on Heart Rate Variability and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Cancer Treatment: A Study Protocol
    Brunet, Jennifer
    Wurz, Amanda
    Hussien, Julia
    Pitman, Anne
    Conte, Ellen
    Ennis, Julie K.
    Herry, Christophe L.
    Seely, Andrew J. E.
    Seely, Dugald
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2022, 21
  • [42] Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
    Addario, Bonnie
    Geissler, Jan
    Horn, Marcia K.
    Krebs, Linda U.
    Maskens, Deborah
    Oliver, Kathy
    Plate, Ananda
    Schwartz, Erin
    Willmarth, Nicole
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [43] Patient-reported outcome measures after treatment for prostate cancer: Results from the Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DAPROCAdata)
    Nguyen-Nielsen, Mary
    Moller, Henrik
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Borre, Michael
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 64
  • [44] Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Experience of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the IMPACT-AF Clinical Trial
    Humphries, Brittany
    Cox, Jafna L.
    Parkash, Ratika
    Thabane, Lehana
    Foster, Gary A.
    MacKillop, James
    Nemis-White, Joanna
    Hamilton, Laura
    Ciaccia, Antonio
    Choudhri, Shurjeel H.
    Xie, Feng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (15):
  • [45] Effect of patient-reported outcomes as a dialogue-based tool in cancer consultations on patient self-management and health-related quality of life: a clinical, controlled trial
    Skovlund, Pernille Christiansen
    Vind Thaysen, Henriette
    Schmidt, Henrik
    Alsner, Jan
    Hjollund, Niels Henrik
    Lomborg, Kirsten
    Nielsen, Berit Kjaerside
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (12) : 1668 - 1677
  • [46] Engaging stakeholders to improve presentation of patient-reported outcomes data in clinical practice
    Katherine C. Smith
    Michael D. Brundage
    Elliott Tolbert
    Emily A. Little
    Elissa T. Bantug
    Claire F. Snyder
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 4149 - 4157
  • [47] THE INFLUENCE OF AGE ON CLINICAL AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    MORT, EA
    GUADAGNOLI, E
    SCHROEDER, SA
    GREENFIELD, S
    MULLEY, AG
    MCNEIL, BJ
    CLEARY, PD
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 9 (02) : 61 - 65
  • [48] Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancer patients before and after pelvic exenteration
    Armbruster, Shannon D.
    Sun, Charlotte C.
    Westin, Shannon N.
    Bodurka, Diane C.
    Ramondetta, Lois
    Meyer, Larissa A.
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 (03) : 484 - 490
  • [49] Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Systemic Antibiotic Adjunct to Nonsurgical Treatment of Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Parhizkar, Parastoo
    Yaghini, Jaber
    Fakheran, Omid
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 11 (01):
  • [50] Patient-Reported Outcomes From the United States Clinical Trial for a Hybrid Cochlear Implant
    Kelsall, David C.
    Arnold, Renee J. G.
    Lionnet, Leonard
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (09) : 1251 - 1261