Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment Discontinuation: Commercial Clinical Trial Data From Four Cancer Types

被引:6
|
作者
King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L. [1 ]
Lederer, Nirosha Mahendraratnam [1 ]
Kim, Janice [2 ]
Nair, Abhilasha [2 ]
Horodniceanu, Erica [1 ]
Bhatnagar, Vishal [1 ]
Kluetz, Paul G. [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Oncol Ctr Excellence, Bldg 22,10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
cancer; clinical trials; patient-reported outcomes; regulatory; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.1279
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: How frequently patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are collected in commercial cancer clinical trials after treatment discontinuation and the quality of that data are poorly understood. We reviewed treatment discontinuation follow-up PRO data collection to learn about trials collecting these data and understand data quality. The review included 4 cancer types representing potential for long-(prostate cancer), medium -/long-(breast cancer), and short-term (pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma) follow-up owing to disease trajectory. Methods: We reviewed registration trials in US Food and Drug Administration databases between January 2010 and January 2019. Protocols were reviewed to determine whether PROs were collected and, if so, whether these included the follow-up phase. Clinical study reports were reviewed when follow-up PROs were collected to determine completion rates. Results were summarized using descriptive analyses. Results: Of the 46 trials containing PRO data, 46% had at least 1 follow-up PRO assessment. Follow-up schedules of assessment were wide ranging; the first assessment occurred between 30 days and 6 months after stopping treatment with follow-up for as long as 3 years. PRO completion rates were reported in 57% of 21 trials; at the first follow-up assessment, completion rates for the treatment arm ranged from 38% to 91% and from 41% to 100% in the control arm. Conclusions: The quality of the follow-up PRO data, based on completion rates, was variable, as was the duration of follow-up. A clear research objective should be developed for follow-up PRO data, accounting for patient burden. If PRO data are collected, monitoring should be implemented to improve completion because poor completion limits data use in the benefit-risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1307
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Clinical Trials A Call for Action!
    Joly, Florence
    McAlpine, Jessica
    Nout, Remi
    Avall-Lundqvist, Elisabeth
    Shash, Emad
    Friedlander, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 1693 - 1699
  • [32] Selecting a Subset Based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring in Lung Cancer Treatment: Mixed Methods Study
    Veldhuijzen, Evalien
    Walraven, Iris
    Belderbos, Jose
    JMIR CANCER, 2021, 7 (03):
  • [33] Patient-Reported Outcomes as a Recruitment Strategy for Clinical Trial Enrollment
    Verdini, Nicholas P.
    Bryl, Karolina L.
    Baser, Raymond E.
    Lapen, Kaitlyn
    Mao, Jun J.
    Gillespie, Erin F.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (06) : 784 - 788
  • [34] Clinician/Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Association After Root Canal Treatment
    Wong, Jasmine
    Lee, Angeline Hui Cheng
    Cheung, Gary Shun Pan
    Mcgrath, Colman
    Neelakantan, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2024, 50 (12) : 1725 - 1733
  • [35] Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery
    Schandl, Anna
    Johar, Asif
    Anandavadivelan, Poorna
    Vikstrom, Karin
    Malberg, Kalle
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2020, 59 (06) : 613 - 619
  • [36] Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Donovan, J. L.
    Hamdy, F. C.
    Lane, J. A.
    Mason, M.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Walsh, E.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Peters, T. J.
    Holding, P.
    Bonnington, S.
    Lennon, T.
    Bradshaw, L.
    Cooper, D.
    Herbert, P.
    Howson, J.
    Jones, A.
    Lyons, N.
    Salter, E.
    Thompson, P.
    Tidball, S.
    Blaikie, J.
    Gray, C.
    Bollina, P.
    Catto, J.
    Doble, A.
    Doherty, A.
    Gillatt, D.
    Kockelbergh, R.
    Kynaston, H.
    Paul, A.
    Powell, P.
    Prescott, S.
    Rosario, D. J.
    Rowe, E.
    Davis, M.
    Turner, E. L.
    Martin, R. M.
    Neal, D. E.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15): : 1425 - 1437
  • [37] Patient-Reported Outcomes After Hepatic Resection of Colorectal Cancer Metastases
    Rees, Jonathan R.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Fayers, Peter
    Friend, Elizabeth A.
    Welsh, Fenella K. S.
    John, Timothy G.
    Rees, Myrddin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (12) : 1364 - 1370
  • [38] Patient-reported outcomes during and after definitive chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer
    J Rees
    C N Hurt
    S Gollins
    S Mukherjee
    T Maughan
    S J Falk
    J Staffurth
    R Ray
    N Bashir
    J I Geh
    D Cunningham
    R Roy
    J Bridgewater
    G Griffiths
    L S Nixon
    J M Blazeby
    T Crosby
    British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 113 : 603 - 610
  • [39] Isotonic Phase I Cancer Clinical Trial Design Utilizing Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Wages, Nolan A.
    Lin, Ruitao
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 17 (01): : 36 - 45
  • [40] Patient-reported quality of life outcomes following treatment for oral cancer
    Breeze, J.
    Rennie, A.
    Dawson, D.
    Tipper, J.
    Rehman, K. -U.
    Grew, N.
    Pigadas, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (03) : 296 - 301