Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment Discontinuation: Commercial Clinical Trial Data From Four Cancer Types

被引:6
|
作者
King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L. [1 ]
Lederer, Nirosha Mahendraratnam [1 ]
Kim, Janice [2 ]
Nair, Abhilasha [2 ]
Horodniceanu, Erica [1 ]
Bhatnagar, Vishal [1 ]
Kluetz, Paul G. [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Oncol Ctr Excellence, Bldg 22,10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
cancer; clinical trials; patient-reported outcomes; regulatory; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.1279
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: How frequently patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are collected in commercial cancer clinical trials after treatment discontinuation and the quality of that data are poorly understood. We reviewed treatment discontinuation follow-up PRO data collection to learn about trials collecting these data and understand data quality. The review included 4 cancer types representing potential for long-(prostate cancer), medium -/long-(breast cancer), and short-term (pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma) follow-up owing to disease trajectory. Methods: We reviewed registration trials in US Food and Drug Administration databases between January 2010 and January 2019. Protocols were reviewed to determine whether PROs were collected and, if so, whether these included the follow-up phase. Clinical study reports were reviewed when follow-up PROs were collected to determine completion rates. Results were summarized using descriptive analyses. Results: Of the 46 trials containing PRO data, 46% had at least 1 follow-up PRO assessment. Follow-up schedules of assessment were wide ranging; the first assessment occurred between 30 days and 6 months after stopping treatment with follow-up for as long as 3 years. PRO completion rates were reported in 57% of 21 trials; at the first follow-up assessment, completion rates for the treatment arm ranged from 38% to 91% and from 41% to 100% in the control arm. Conclusions: The quality of the follow-up PRO data, based on completion rates, was variable, as was the duration of follow-up. A clear research objective should be developed for follow-up PRO data, accounting for patient burden. If PRO data are collected, monitoring should be implemented to improve completion because poor completion limits data use in the benefit-risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1307
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pelvic Recovery After Endometrial Cancer Treatment: Patient-Reported Outcomes and MRI Findings
    Maturen, Katherine E.
    Martin, Marisa F.
    Chapman, Christina H.
    McLean, Karen
    Michaels, Brandy N.
    Uppal, Shitanshu
    Prisciandaro, Joann I.
    Wittmann, Daniela A.
    Jolly, Shruti
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 : S202 - S210
  • [22] Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Gavaruzzi, Teresa
    Lotto, Lorella
    Giandomenico, Francesca
    Perin, Alessandro
    Pucciarelli, Salvatore
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (08) : 901 - 918
  • [23] Survivorship after lower gastrointestinal cancer: Patient-reported outcomes and planning for care
    Frick, Melissa A.
    Vachani, Carolyn C.
    Hampshire, Margaret K.
    Bach, Christina
    Arnold-Korzeniowski, Karen
    Metz, James M.
    Hill-Kayser, Christine E.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (10) : 1860 - 1868
  • [24] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: Facilitating and Enhancing the Reporting of Symptoms, Adverse Events, and Subjective Benefit of Treatment in Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice
    Campbell, Rachel
    King, Madeleine T.
    Stockler, Martin R.
    Lee, Yeh Chen
    Roncolato, Felicia T.
    Friedlander, Michael L.
    PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES, 2023, 14 : 111 - 126
  • [25] Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy
    Andresen, Andreas Kiilerich
    Paulsen, Rune Tendal
    Busch, Frederik
    Isenberg-Jorgensen, Alexander
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    Andersen, Mikkel O.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (07) : 703 - 708
  • [26] Patient-reported outcomes in head and neck cancer treatment: relevance, challenges, and benefit
    Singer, Susanne
    Bergelt, Corinna
    Tribius, Silke
    Laban, Simon
    Busch, Chia-Jung
    HNO, 2023, 71 (09) : 592 - 598
  • [27] Verwendung und Nutzen von Patient-Reported Outcomes in der onkologischen Behandlung: eine ÜbersichtThe benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview
    Lisa M. Wintner
    Johannes M. Giesinger
    Georg Kemmler
    Monika Sztankay
    Anne Oberguggenberger
    Eva-Maria Gamper
    Barbara Sperner-Unterweger
    Bernhard Holzner
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2012, 124 : 293 - 303
  • [28] Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
    Massarotti, Elena M.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 30 (03) : 429 - 442
  • [29] The predictive value of patient-reported outcomes on the impact of breast cancer treatment-related quality of life
    Zhou, Ke
    Bellanger, Martine
    Le Lann, Sophie
    Robert, Marie
    Frenel, Jean-Sebastien
    Campone, Mario
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [30] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Three Different Types of Breast Reconstruction with Correlation to the Clinical Data 5 Years Postoperatively
    Ticha, Pavla
    Mestak, Ondrej
    Wu, Meagan
    Bujda, Michele
    Sukop, Andrej
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 44 (06) : 2021 - 2029