Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment Discontinuation: Commercial Clinical Trial Data From Four Cancer Types

被引:6
|
作者
King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L. [1 ]
Lederer, Nirosha Mahendraratnam [1 ]
Kim, Janice [2 ]
Nair, Abhilasha [2 ]
Horodniceanu, Erica [1 ]
Bhatnagar, Vishal [1 ]
Kluetz, Paul G. [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Oncol Ctr Excellence, Bldg 22,10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
cancer; clinical trials; patient-reported outcomes; regulatory; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.1279
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: How frequently patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are collected in commercial cancer clinical trials after treatment discontinuation and the quality of that data are poorly understood. We reviewed treatment discontinuation follow-up PRO data collection to learn about trials collecting these data and understand data quality. The review included 4 cancer types representing potential for long-(prostate cancer), medium -/long-(breast cancer), and short-term (pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma) follow-up owing to disease trajectory. Methods: We reviewed registration trials in US Food and Drug Administration databases between January 2010 and January 2019. Protocols were reviewed to determine whether PROs were collected and, if so, whether these included the follow-up phase. Clinical study reports were reviewed when follow-up PROs were collected to determine completion rates. Results were summarized using descriptive analyses. Results: Of the 46 trials containing PRO data, 46% had at least 1 follow-up PRO assessment. Follow-up schedules of assessment were wide ranging; the first assessment occurred between 30 days and 6 months after stopping treatment with follow-up for as long as 3 years. PRO completion rates were reported in 57% of 21 trials; at the first follow-up assessment, completion rates for the treatment arm ranged from 38% to 91% and from 41% to 100% in the control arm. Conclusions: The quality of the follow-up PRO data, based on completion rates, was variable, as was the duration of follow-up. A clear research objective should be developed for follow-up PRO data, accounting for patient burden. If PRO data are collected, monitoring should be implemented to improve completion because poor completion limits data use in the benefit-risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1307
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perspectives on Patient-Reported Outcome Data After Treatment Discontinuation in Cancer Clinical Trials
    King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L.
    Calvert, Melanie
    Cella, David
    Cocks, Kim
    Coens, Corneel
    Fairclough, Diane
    Howie, Lynn
    Jonsson, Pall
    Mahendraratnam, Nirosha
    Maues, Julia
    Sarac, Sinan
    Shaw, Jim
    Stigger, Nichelle
    Trask, Peter
    Wieseler, Beate
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (10) : 1543 - 1548
  • [2] Patient-Reported Outcomes Clinical Trials in Ovarian Cancer
    Carey, Mark S.
    Gotay, Carolyn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2011, 21 (04) : 782 - 787
  • [3] Integrating Patient Reported Outcomes With Clinical Cancer Registry Data: A Feasibility Study of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) System
    Ashley, Laura
    Jones, Helen
    Thomas, James
    Newsham, Alex
    Downing, Amy
    Morris, Eva
    Brown, Julia
    Velikova, Galina
    Forman, David
    Wright, Penny
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (10) : 178 - 196
  • [4] Patient-reported outcomes in ovarian cancer clinical trials
    Friedlander, M. L.
    King, M. T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 : 64 - 68
  • [5] The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview
    Wintner, Lisa M.
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    Kemmler, Georg
    Sztankay, Monika
    Oberguggenberger, Anne
    Gamper, Eva-Maria
    Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara
    Holzner, Bernhard
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2012, 124 (9-10) : 293 - 303
  • [6] Patient-reported outcomes in cancer cachexia clinical trials
    Wheelwright, Sally J.
    Johnson, Colin D.
    Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, 2015, 9 (04) : 325 - 332
  • [7] Patient-reported outcomes after prostate cancer treatment
    Grover, Surbhi
    Metz, James M.
    Vachani, Carolyn
    Hampshire, Margaret K.
    DiLullo, Gloria A.
    Hill-Kayser, Christine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2014, 7 (04) : 286 - 294
  • [8] Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Randomized Trial Comparing Four Different Treatment Strategies in Recent-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis
    van der Kooij, S. M.
    de Vries-Bouwstra, J. K.
    Goekoop-Ruiterman, Y. P. M.
    Ewals, J. A. P. M.
    Han, K. H.
    Hazes, J. M. W.
    Kerstens, P. J. S. M.
    Peeters, A. J.
    van Zeben, D.
    Breedveld, F. C.
    Huizinga, T. W. J.
    Dijkmans, B. A. C.
    Allaart, C. F.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2009, 61 (01): : 4 - 12
  • [9] Overcoming barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: the PROMOTION Registry
    Fabio Efficace
    Jonathan Rees
    Peter Fayers
    Andrea Pusic
    Martin Taphoorn
    Elfriede Greimel
    Jaap Reijneveld
    Katie Whale
    Jane Blazeby
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12
  • [10] Overcoming barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: the PROMOTION Registry
    Efficace, Fabio
    Rees, Jonathan
    Fayers, Peter
    Pusic, Andrea
    Taphoorn, Martin
    Greimel, Elfriede
    Reijneveld, Jaap
    Whale, Katie
    Blazeby, Jane
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12