Sensitivity Analysis of Linear Structural Causal Models

被引:0
作者
Cinelli, Carlos [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Kumor, Daniel [3 ,5 ]
Chen, Bryant [4 ,5 ]
Pearl, Judea [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Bareinboim, Elias [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Stat, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Comp Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Comp Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Brex, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] IBM Res AI, Albany, NY USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 97 | 2019年 / 97卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BIAS FORMULAS; IDENTIFICATION; REGRESSION; INFERENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Causal inference requires assumptions about the data generating process, many of which are unverifiable from the data. Given that some causal assumptions might be uncertain or disputed, formal methods are needed to quantify how sensitive research conclusions are to violations of those assumptions. Although an extensive literature exists on the topic, most results are limited to specific model structures, while a general-purpose algorithmic framework for sensitivity analysis is still lacking. In this paper, we develop a formal, systematic approach to sensitivity analysis for arbitrary linear Structural Causal Models (SCMs). We start by formalizing sensitivity analysis as a constrained identification problem. We then develop an efficient, graph-based identification algorithm that exploits non-zero constraints on both directed and bidirected edges. This allows researchers to systematically derive sensitivity curves for a target causal quantity with an arbitrary set of path coefficients and error covariances as sensitivity parameters. These results can be used to display the degree to which violations of causal assumptions affect the target quantity of interest, and to judge, on scientific grounds, whether problematic degrees of violations are plausible.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1958, The Centennial Review of Arts Science
[2]   Bias Analysis for Uncontrolled Confounding in the Health Sciences [J].
Arah, Onyebuchi A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 38, 2017, 38 :23-38
[3]  
Bardet M., 2002, COMPLEXITY GROBNER B, P8
[4]  
Bareinboim E.Chen., 2016, Proceed- ings of the Twenty-fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, P3577
[5]   Causal inference and the data-fusion problem [J].
Bareinboim, Elias ;
Pearl, Judea .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (27) :7345-7352
[6]  
Bareinboim Elias, 2012, P 28 C UNC ART INT, P113
[7]   A Selection Bias Approach to Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Effects [J].
Blackwell, Matthew .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 22 (02) :169-182
[8]  
Brito C., 2002, P 18 C UNC ART INT, P85
[9]   Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures [J].
Brumback, BA ;
Hernán, MA ;
Haneuse, SJPA ;
Robins, JM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (05) :749-767
[10]   Assessing Sensitivity to Unmeasured Confounding Using a Simulated Potential Confounder [J].
Carnegie, Nicole Bohme ;
Harada, Masataka ;
Hill, Jennifer L. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, 2016, 9 (03) :395-420