Systematic Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Protocol Content and Reporting in Cancer Trials

被引:77
作者
Kyte, Derek [1 ,2 ,17 ,18 ]
Retzer, Ameeta [1 ]
Ahmed, Khaled [1 ]
Keeley, Thomas [1 ]
Armes, Jo [2 ,3 ]
Brown, Julia M. [4 ]
Calman, Lynn [2 ,5 ]
Gavin, Anna [2 ,6 ]
Glaser, Adam W. [2 ,7 ]
Greenfield, Diana M. [2 ,8 ,9 ]
Lanceley, Anne [2 ,10 ]
Taylor, Rachel M. [2 ,11 ]
Velikova, Galina [7 ]
Brundage, Michael [12 ]
Efficace, Fabio [13 ]
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca [14 ,15 ,16 ]
King, Madeleine T. [14 ,15 ]
Turner, Grace [1 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ,17 ,18 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] NCRI, Psychosocial Oncol & Survivorship CSG Subgrp Unde, London, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Sch Hlth Sci, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Clin Trials Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Hlth Sci, Macmillan Survivorship Res Grp, Highfield Campus, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Queens Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth, N Ireland Canc Registry, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[7] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Canc & Pathol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[9] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[10] UCL, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Inst Womens Hlth, Med Sch Bldg, London, England
[11] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Canc Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[12] Queens Canc Res Inst, Queens Dept Oncol, Sch Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
[13] Italian Grp Adult Hematol Dis GIMEMA, Hlth Outcomes Res Unit, Rome, Italy
[14] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[15] Univ Sydney, Psycho Oncol Cooperat Res Grp, Sch Psychol, Fac Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[16] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[17] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Birmingham Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[18] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2019年 / 111卷 / 11期
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY; PRO; GUIDELINES; DISEASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djz038
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are captured within cancer trials to help future patients and their clinicians make more informed treatment decisions. However, variability in standards of PRO trial design and reporting threaten the validity of these endpoints for application in clinical practice. Methods: We systematically investigated a cohort of randomized controlled cancer trials that included a primary or secondary PRO. For each trial, an evaluation of protocol and reporting quality was undertaken using standard checklists. General patterns of reporting where also explored. Results: Protocols (101 sourced, 44.3%) included a mean (SD) of 10 (4) of 33 (range = 2-19) PRO protocol checklist items. Recommended items frequently omitted included the rationale and objectives underpinning PRO collection and approaches to minimize/address missing PRO data. Of 160 trials with published results, 61 (38.1%, 95% confidence interval = 30.6% to 45.7%) failed to include their PRO findings in any publication (mean 6.43-year follow-up); these trials included 49568 participants. Although two-thirds of included trials published PRO findings, reporting standards were often inadequate according to international guidelines (mean [SD] inclusion of 3 [3] of 14 [range = 0-11]) CONSORT PRO Extension checklist items). More than one-half of trials publishing PRO results in a secondary publication (12 of 22, 54.5%) took 4 or more years to do so following trial closure, with eight (36.4%) taking 5-8 years and one trial publishing after 14 years. Conclusions: PRO protocol content is frequently inadequate, and nonreporting of PRO findings is widespread, meaning patient-important information may not be available to benefit patients, clinicians, and regulators. Even where PRO data are published, there is often considerable delay and reporting quality is suboptimal. This study presents key recommendations to enhance the likelihood of successful delivery of PROs in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:1170 / 1178
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Systematic evaluation of patientreported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study protocol
    Ahmed, Khaled
    Kyte, Derek
    Keeley, Thomas
    Efficace, Fabio
    Armes, Jo
    Brown, Julia M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Copland, Chris
    Gavin, Anna
    Glaser, Adam
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Lanceley, Anne
    Taylor, Rachel
    Velikova, Galina
    Brundage, Michael
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine T.
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09):
  • [2] The Use of Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) Within Comparative Effectiveness Research Implications for Clinical Practice and Health Care Policy
    Ahmed, Sara
    Berzon, Richard A.
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    Lenderking, William R.
    Moinpour, Carol M.
    Basch, Ethan
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Wu, Albert W.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (12) : 1060 - 1070
  • [3] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review protocol
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Keeley, Thomas
    Gheorghe, Adrian
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (10):
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, GUID IND PAT REP OUT
  • [5] [Anonymous], JPN PHARM THER
  • [6] ASCO, 2016, ASCO VAL FRAM UPD
  • [7] Toward Patient-Centered Drug Development in Oncology
    Basch, Ethan
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (05) : 397 - 400
  • [8] Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes
    Basch, Ethan
    Jia, Xiaoyu
    Heller, Glenn
    Barz, Allison
    Sit, Laura
    Fruscione, Michael
    Appawu, Mark
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Atkinson, Thomas
    Goldfarb, Shari
    Culkin, Ann
    Kris, Mark G.
    Schrag, Deborah
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (23): : 1624 - 1632
  • [9] Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: A qualitative study
    Brundage, M
    Leis, A
    Bezjak, A
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    Degner, L
    Velji, K
    Zetes-Zanatta, L
    Tu, D
    Ritvo, P
    Pater, J
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (04) : 395 - 404
  • [10] Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers
    Brundage, Michael
    Bass, Brenda
    Davidson, Judith
    Queenan, John
    Bezjak, Andrea
    Ringash, Jolie
    Wilkinson, Anna
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (05) : 653 - 664