National responsibilities in European species conservation: A methodological review

被引:86
作者
Schmeller, Dirk S. [1 ,5 ]
Gruber, Bernd [1 ,6 ]
Budrys, Eduardas [2 ]
Framsted, Erik [3 ]
Lengyel, Szabolcs [4 ]
Henle, Klaus [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Conservat Biol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Vilnius State Univ, Inst Ecol, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Norwegian Inst Nat Res, N-0105 Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Debrecen, Dept Ecol, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
[5] CNRS, Stn Ecol Expt, F-09200 St Girons, France
[6] UFZ Helmohltz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permo, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
conservation methods; conservation priorities; Europe; national responsibility; species conservation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00961.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
One particular challenge in reducing the loss of biodiversity by 2010, as agreed on at the Earth Summit in 2002, is to assign conservation tasks to geographic or administrative entities (e.g., countries or regions) on different geographical scales. To identify conservation tasks, it is imperative to determine the importance of a specific area for the global survival of a species. So far, these national or subnational responsibilities for the conservation of species have been included differently in methods prioritizing conservation. We reviewed how 12 European and 3 non-European methods determined national conservation responsibilities and evaluated the international importance of a biological population. Different countries used different methodologies, which made a direct comparison of assessments of national responsibilities among countries extremely difficult Differences existed in the importance criteria used. Criteria included population decline, range reduction, rarity status, degree of isolation of a population, endemism, proportional distribution, and geographic location. To increase comparability, it is imperative to develop criteria for which data are generally available and to standardize the methodology among countries. A standardized method would allow conservation decisions to be based on the conservation status of a species and on the responsibility of a geographic or administrative entity for the survival of a species. We suggest that such a method should use a scalable index of proportional distribution, taxonomic status, and the distribution pattern of a taxon or species as key elements. Such a method would allow for the creation of hierarchical lists and would be highly relevant for parts of the world with multiple political jurisdictions or state unions and for nations with regional governmental structures. Conservation priorities could then be reasonably set by combining national responsibility assessments with the international conservation status of a species.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 601
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, NATURSCHUTZ BIOL VIE
  • [2] [Anonymous], CONSERVATION PRIORIT
  • [3] AVERY M, 1994, IBIS S, V137, P232
  • [4] Global biodiversity conservation priorities
    Brooks, T. M.
    Mittermeier, R. A.
    da Fonseca, G. A. B.
    Gerlach, J.
    Hoffmann, M.
    Lamoreux, J. F.
    Mittermeier, C. G.
    Pilgrim, J. D.
    Rodrigues, A. S. L.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5783) : 58 - 61
  • [5] BURFIELD I, 2004, CONSERVATION SERIES, V12
  • [6] Casale P., 2015, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, V8235, P15, DOI DOI 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T83776383A83776554.EN
  • [7] An evaluation of threatened species categorization systems used on the American continent
    de Grammont, PC
    Cuarón, AD
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 14 - 27
  • [8] Denz Olaf, 2003, Vogelwelt, V124, P1
  • [9] Regional IUCN red listing: the process as applied to birds in the United Kingdom
    Eaton, MA
    Gregory, RD
    Noble, DG
    Robinson, JA
    Hughes, J
    Procter, D
    Brown, AF
    Gibbons, DW
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (05) : 1557 - 1570
  • [10] FAY JJ, 1996, FED REGISTER, V61, P4721