Understanding Faking Behavior Through the Lens of Motivation: An Application of VIE Theory

被引:66
作者
Ellingson, Jill E. [1 ]
McFarland, Lynn A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Management & Human Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXPECTANCY-THEORY; PERSONALITY-ASSESSMENT; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SELECTION; ABILITY; SCORE; FAKE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1080/08959285.2011.597477
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article proposes a conceptual framework to explain faking behavior on self-report personality inventories. Unlike prior conceptualizations, this framework is simultaneously parsimonious yet inclusive. The theory posits that all determinants of faking behavior occur through valence, instrumentality, expectancy, or ability to fake. We review the faking literature to show how the multitude of factors found to influence faking can be concisely modeled within our framework. We intend for this theory to serve as a guide for future research on faking behavior, and we encourage researchers to explore and adopt the framework in the interest of enabling a more theoretically satisfying approach to the study of faking.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 337
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   INFLATION BIAS IN SELF-ASSESSMENT EXAMINATIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR VALID EMPLOYEE SELECTION [J].
ANDERSON, CD ;
WARNER, JL ;
SPENCER, CC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 69 (04) :574-580
[2]   The inclusion of antisocial behavior in the construct of psychopathy: A review of the research [J].
Andrade, Joel T. .
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2008, 13 (04) :328-335
[3]  
Berry CM, 2009, PERS PSYCHOL, V62, P835
[4]   Predicting Individual Score Elevation in an Applicant Setting: The Influence of Individual Differences and Situational Perceptions [J].
Bott, Jennifer ;
Snell, Andee ;
Dahling, Jason ;
Smith, Brien N. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 40 (11) :2774-2790
[5]   Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? [J].
Bushman, BJ ;
Anderson, CA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (01) :273-279
[6]   The good judge revisited: Individual differences in the accuracy of personality judgments [J].
Christiansen, ND ;
Wolcott-Burnam, S ;
Janovics, JE ;
Burns, GN ;
Quirk, SW .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2005, 18 (02) :123-149
[7]   RESPONSE SETS AND TEST VALIDITY [J].
Cronbach, Lee J. .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1946, 6 (04) :475-494
[8]  
Dilchert S., 2006, PSYCHOL SCI, V48, P209, DOI DOI 10.5964/EJ0P.V8I4.462
[9]   Racial differences in socially desirable responding in selection contexts: Magnitude and consequences [J].
Dudley, NM ;
McFarland, LA ;
Goodman, SA ;
Hunt, ST ;
Sydell, EJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2005, 85 (01) :50-64
[10]   Do warnings not to fake reduce faking? [J].
Dwight, SA ;
Donovan, JJ .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2003, 16 (01) :1-23