Effect of Molecular Weight and Substitution on Tissue Uptake of Hydroxyethyl Starch

Background: Intravenously infused hydroxyethyl starch (HES) can be found in urine, plasma and tissues. HES remaining in plasma and tissues is thought to increase the risk of clinical complications. HES solutions of lower molecular weight and substitution have been developed to increase urinary excretion and reduce plasma persistence. However, their effect on tissue uptake of HES has not been investigated in human subjects. Objective: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that lower molecular weight and substitution decrease tissue uptake of HES. Data sources: Computer searches were performed of MEDLINE; EMBASE; the Cochrane Library; meeting abstract databases in surgery, anaesthesiology and intensive care; ClinicalTrials.gov; and Google. Supplementary sources were reference lists and electronic tables of journal contents. No time period or language restrictions were imposed. Study Selection: Clinical studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, if data were reported both for cumulative urinary excretion of HES over 24 hours after infusion and for plasma HES concentration at 24 hours. Data Extraction: Data were extracted on 24-hour urinary excretion of HES, 24-hour HES plasma concentration, plasma volume, HES molecular weight and substitution, study design, type and demographics of subjects, indication for fluid infusion, and HES infusion regimen. Tissue uptake of HES was computed as the difference between the infused dose and the sum of urinary excretion and residual plasma HES at 24 hours. Data Synthesis: Twenty-five clinical studies totalling 287 subjects were included. Tissue uptake of low-molecular-weight HES (<= 200 kD) was 42.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.6, 45.0) compared with 24.6% (CI 17.8, 31.4) for high-molecular-weight HES (p < 0.001). Similarly, tissue uptake of lower-substitution HES (<= 0.5) was 42.4% (CI 39.5, 45.3) versus 26.6% (CI 19.6, 33.6) for higher-substitution HES (p < 0.001). Among the three most often investigated single HES solutions, tissue uptake of 130/0.4(42.6%; CI 35.0, 50.2) and HES 200/0.5 (43.3%; CI 39.4, 47.2) closely coincided, whereas uptake of HES 450/0.7 (22.2%; CI 14.8, 29.6) was lower (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: This meta-analysis did not support the hypothesis that lower molecular weight and substitution decrease tissue uptake of HES. Further clinical studies of HES tissue uptake are needed.