Mapping the State of the Art to Envision the Future of Large-Scale Citizen Science Projects: An Interpretive Review

被引:1
作者
Palumbo, Rocco [1 ]
Manesh, Mohammad Fakhar [1 ]
Sorrentino, Maddalena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tor Vergata, Dept Management & Law, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Econ Management & Quantitat Methods, Milan, Italy
关键词
Citizen science; participatory research; large-scale research; citizen engagement; citizen involvement; SCIENTISTS; TOOL; CONSERVATION; OCCUPANCY; PARTICIPATION; MOTIVATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; ENGAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1142/S0219877022300014
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Citizen science, i.e. citizens' involvement in research activities, is achieving an increasing relevance across disparate scientific domains. However, literature is not consistent in arguing citizen science's attributes and implications when large-scale projects are concerned. The paper systematizes extant scientific knowledge in this field and identifies avenues for further developments through a bibliometric analysis and an interpretive review. Various approaches to citizen science are implemented to engage citizens in scientific research. They can be located in a continuum composed of two extremes: a contributory approach, which serves research institutions' needs, and an open science approach, which focuses on citizens' active participation in knowledge co-creation. Although contributory citizen science paves the way for participatory science, it falls short in empowering citizens, which is central in the open science approach. Interventions aimed at enabling citizens to have an active role in co-creating knowledge in a perspective of science democratization are key to overcoming the understanding of citizen science as a low-cost model of scientific research and to boost the transition towards an open science approach.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [61] Nascimento S., 2014, From citizen science to do it yourself science
  • [62] A novel citizen science approach for large-scale standardised monitoring of bat activity and distribution, evaluated in eastern England
    Newson, Stuart E.
    Evans, Hazel E.
    Gillings, Simon
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 191 : 38 - 49
  • [63] Analyzing Spatial and Temporal User Behavior in Participatory Sensing
    Ngo Manh Khoi
    Casteleyn, Sven
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2018, 7 (09)
  • [64] Nielsen Michael., 2012, Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science
  • [65] Adopting incentive mechanisms for large-scale participation in mobile crowdsensing: from literature review to a conceptual framework
    Ogie, R. I.
    [J]. HUMAN-CENTRIC COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 6
  • [66] Review articles: purpose, process, and structure
    Palmatier, Robert W.
    Houston, Mark B.
    Hulland, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2018, 46 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [67] Genetic ancestry testing among white nationalists: From identity repair to citizen science
    Panofsky, Aaron
    Donovan, Joan
    [J]. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2019, 49 (05) : 653 - 681
  • [68] Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR)
    Paul, Justin
    Lim, Weng Marc
    O'Cass, Aron
    Hao, Andy Wei
    Bresciani, Stefano
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2021,
  • [69] The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?
    Paul, Justin
    Criado, Alex Rialp
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 29 (04)
  • [70] Accounting for false positives improves estimates of occupancy from key informant interviews
    Pillay, Rajeev
    Miller, David A. W.
    Hines, James E.
    Joshi, Atul A.
    Madhusudan, M. D.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2014, 20 (02) : 223 - 235