Mapping the State of the Art to Envision the Future of Large-Scale Citizen Science Projects: An Interpretive Review

被引:1
作者
Palumbo, Rocco [1 ]
Manesh, Mohammad Fakhar [1 ]
Sorrentino, Maddalena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tor Vergata, Dept Management & Law, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Econ Management & Quantitat Methods, Milan, Italy
关键词
Citizen science; participatory research; large-scale research; citizen engagement; citizen involvement; SCIENTISTS; TOOL; CONSERVATION; OCCUPANCY; PARTICIPATION; MOTIVATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; ENGAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1142/S0219877022300014
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Citizen science, i.e. citizens' involvement in research activities, is achieving an increasing relevance across disparate scientific domains. However, literature is not consistent in arguing citizen science's attributes and implications when large-scale projects are concerned. The paper systematizes extant scientific knowledge in this field and identifies avenues for further developments through a bibliometric analysis and an interpretive review. Various approaches to citizen science are implemented to engage citizens in scientific research. They can be located in a continuum composed of two extremes: a contributory approach, which serves research institutions' needs, and an open science approach, which focuses on citizens' active participation in knowledge co-creation. Although contributory citizen science paves the way for participatory science, it falls short in empowering citizens, which is central in the open science approach. Interventions aimed at enabling citizens to have an active role in co-creating knowledge in a perspective of science democratization are key to overcoming the understanding of citizen science as a low-cost model of scientific research and to boost the transition towards an open science approach.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [41] Handling uncertainty in citizen science data: Towards an improved amateur-based large-scale classification
    Jimenez, Manuel
    Triguero, Isaac
    John, Robert
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 479 : 301 - 320
  • [42] Network environmentalism: Citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy
    Johnson, McKenzie F.
    Hannah, Corrie
    Acton, Leslie
    Popovici, Ruxandra
    Karanth, Krithi K.
    Weinthal, Erika
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 29 : 235 - 245
  • [43] Evaluation of an Easy-to-Install, Low-Cost Dendrometer Band for Citizen-Science Tree Research
    Just, Michael G.
    Frank, Steven D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2019, 117 (04) : 317 - 322
  • [44] Using citizen scientists to measure an ecosystem service nationwide
    Kaartinen, Riikka
    Hardwick, Bess
    Roslin, Tomas
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2013, 94 (11) : 2645 - 2652
  • [45] The epistemic culture in an online citizen science project: Programs, antiprograms and epistemic subjects
    Kasperowski, Dick
    Hillman, Thomas
    [J]. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2018, 48 (04) : 564 - 588
  • [46] Deep learning at scale for the construction of galaxy catalogs in the Dark Energy Survey
    Khan, Asad
    Huerta, E. A.
    Wang, Sibo
    Gruendl, Robert
    Jennings, Elise
    Zheng, Huihuo
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2019, 795 : 248 - 258
  • [47] Citizen Science and Wildlife Disease Surveillance
    Lawson, Becki
    Petrovan, Silviu O.
    Cunningham, Andrew A.
    [J]. ECOHEALTH, 2015, 12 (04) : 693 - 702
  • [48] Smartphone Icon User Interface design for non-literate trackers and its implications for an inclusive citizen science
    Liebenberg, Louis
    Steventon, Justin
    Brahman, INate
    Benadie, Karel
    Minye, James
    Langwane, Horekhwe
    Xhukwe, Quashe
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 208 : 155 - 162
  • [49] Lin Y.P., 2019, PLOS ONE, V14
  • [50] Lintott C, 2020, ASTRON GEOPHYS, V61, P20