An economic assessment of the Kyoto Protocol application

被引:34
作者
Dagoumas, AS [1 ]
Papagiannis, GK [1 ]
Dokopoulos, PS [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Power Syst Lab, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
GTAP-E; climate change; Kyoto Protocol; Marrakech accords; COP; 9; MAQ; emission trading;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.05.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Scope of this paper is to investigate scenarios concerning the economic implications of the Kyoto Protocol (The Kyoto Protocol to the Convention on Climate change, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdo in its current version including the clean development mechanisms (CDMs), the Marrakesh Accords (Seventh session of the Conference of Parties, 29 October-9 November, Marrakesh, Morocco, http://unfccc.int/cop7/index.html) and the Conference of Parties 9 in Milan (Nineth session of the Conference of Parties, 1-12 December, Milan, http://unfccc.int/cop9/index.html). The general equilibrium model, GTAP-E was used for the investigation of the experiments which are focused on the cases of the USA participation and on the role of Russia as a major emission credits seller. A significant issue in the Kyoto Protocol negotiations is the introduction of sinks in the Marrakech Accords. This seems to weaken the initial targets by replacing CO, emissions reduction with forestation activities and reduces the cost of the Protocol compliance. It is also shown that the absence of the USA may reduce the costs for the other developed countries and may influence the total costs more than the CDMs. A new scenario is studied by introducing a guaranteed minimum of 60% in the emission credits sold by Russia. Results show that the profits of Russia are not significantly affected by the guaranteed minimum. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 39
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], WORLD EC OUTL
  • [2] [Anonymous], 40 MIT
  • [3] ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
  • [4] BAHN O, 2001, MODELLING ASSESSING
  • [5] BERNARD A, 2002, EFFECTS US WITHDRAWA
  • [6] Böhringer C, 2002, ENERGY J, V23, P51
  • [7] Burniaux J.-M., 2002, 16 GTAP
  • [8] Carbon quota price and CDM potentials after Marrakesh
    Chen, WY
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (08) : 709 - 719
  • [9] CHRISTOPHER NM, 1999, ENERGY J, P25
  • [10] Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings:: an assessment using the POLES model
    Criqui, P
    Mima, S
    Viguier, L
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (10) : 585 - 601