Investigating Students' Answering Behaviors in a Computer-Based Mathematics Algebra Test: A Cognitive-Load Perspective

被引:3
作者
Wang, Jing-Fong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Tzu-Hua [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Chao-Hsien [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Educ & Learning Technol, Hsinchu 300193, Taiwan
[2] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Res Ctr Educ & Mind Sci, Hsinchu 300193, Taiwan
关键词
computer-based testing; cognitive load; mathematics algebra questions; element interactivity; practice effect; individual differences; SPLIT-ATTENTION; WORKING-MEMORY; TEST MODE; MULTIMEDIA; ABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/bs12080293
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Computer-based testing is an emerging method to evaluate students' mathematics learning outcomes. However, algebra problems impose a high cognitive load due to requiring multiple calculation steps, which might reduce students' performance in computer-based testing. In order to understand students' cognitive load when answering algebra questions in a computer-based testing environment, three perspectives, element interactivity, practice effect, and individual differences, were investigated in this study. Seven levels of algebra exam questions were created using unary and simultaneous linear equations, and the inverse efficiency scores were employed as a measure of cognitive load in the study. Forty undergraduate and graduate students were tested. There were four findings: (1) As the element interactivity of test materials increased, the cognitive load increased rapidly. (2) The high-efficiency group had a lower cognitive load than the low-efficiency group, suggesting that the high-efficiency group had an advantage in a computer-based testing environment. (3) "Practice" has a considerable effect on reducing cognitive load, particularly in level 6 and 7 test items. (4) The low-efficiency group can reduce but not eliminate the gap with the high-efficiency group; they may require additional experience in a computer-based testing environment in order to improve reducing their cognitive load.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Working memory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching [J].
Baddeley, A ;
Chincotta, D ;
Adlam, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2001, 130 (04) :641-657
[2]  
Bersoff D., 1984, SOCIAL TECHNICAL ISS
[3]   Expository multimedia comprehension in E-learning: Presentation format, verbal ability and working memory capacity [J].
Burin, Debora I. ;
Gonzalez, Federico M. ;
Martinez, Magali ;
Marrujo, Jonathan G. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2021, 37 (03) :797-809
[4]   Using cognitive load theory to structure computer-based learning including MOOCs [J].
Chen, O. ;
Woolcott, G. ;
Sweller, J. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2017, 33 (04) :293-305
[5]   Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect [J].
Clariana, R ;
Wallace, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 33 (05) :593-602
[6]   A comparison between paper-based and online learning in higher education [J].
Emerson, Lisa ;
MacKay, Bruce .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 42 (05) :727-735
[7]   The multiple effects of practice: skill, habit and reduced cognitive load [J].
Haith, Adrian M. ;
Krakauer, John W. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2018, 20 :196-201
[8]  
Hensley K.K., 2015, THESIS U IOWA, DOI [10.17077/etd.ireseh1q, DOI 10.17077/ETD.IRESEH1Q]
[9]   The Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Broad Measures of Cognitive Ability in Healthy Adults and People With Schizophrenia [J].
Johnson, Melissa K. ;
McMahon, Robert P. ;
Robinson, Benjamin M. ;
Harvey, Alexander N. ;
Hahn, Britta ;
Leonard, Carly J. ;
Luck, Steven J. ;
Gold, James M. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 27 (02) :220-229
[10]   Computer Versus Paper-Does It Make Any Difference in Test Performance? [J].
Karay, Yassin ;
Schauber, Stefan K. ;
Stosch, Christoph ;
Schuettpelz-Brauns, Katrin .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2015, 27 (01) :57-62