Machine Learning to Assess Relatedness: The Advantage of Using Firm-Level Data

被引:6
作者
Albora, Giambattista [1 ,2 ]
Zaccaria, Andrea [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Enrico Fermi Ctr Study & Res, Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ, Dept Phys, Rome, Italy
[3] CNR, Inst Complex Syst, UOS Sapienza, Rome, Italy
关键词
COHERENCE;
D O I
10.1155/2022/2095048
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The relatedness between a country or a firm and a product is a measure of the feasibility of that economic activity. As such, it is a driver for investments at a private and institutional level. Traditionally, relatedness is measured using networks derived by country-level co-occurrences of product pairs, that is counting how many countries export both. In this work, we compare networks and machine learning algorithms trained not only on country-level data, but also on firms, which is something not much studied due to the low availability of firm-level data. We quantitatively compare the different measures of relatedness, by using them to forecast the exports at the country and firm level, assuming that more related products have a higher likelihood to be exported in the future. Our results show that relatedness is scale dependent: the best assessments are obtained by using machine learning on the same typology of data one wants to predict. Moreover, we found that while relatedness measures based on country data are not suitable for firms, firm-level data are very informative also for the development of countries. In this sense, models built on firm data provide a better assessment of relatedness. We also discuss the effect of using parameter optimization and community detection algorithms to identify clusters of related companies and products, finding that a partition into a higher number of blocks decreases the computational time while maintaining a prediction performance well above the network-based benchmarks.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Albora G., 2022, ARXIV
[2]  
Albora G., 2021, ARXIV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MEASURING IND RELATE
[4]  
Aurelien G., 2018, HANDS ON MACHINE LEA
[5]   TRADE LIBERALISATION AND REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BALASSA, B .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1965, 33 (02) :99-123
[6]   Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks [J].
Barber, Michael J. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2007, 76 (06)
[7]   Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric [J].
Boughorbel, Sabri ;
Jarray, Fethi ;
El-Anbari, Mohammed .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06)
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]  
Breiman L, 1996, MACH LEARN, V24, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1018054314350
[10]   Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification [J].
Breschi, S ;
Lissoni, F ;
Malerba, F .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (01) :69-87