"Minimal clinically important difference" estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program

被引:30
作者
Benaim, Charles [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Blaser, Simon [3 ]
Leger, Bertrand [2 ,3 ]
Vuistiner, Philippe [3 ]
Luthi, Francois [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Av Pierre Decker 4, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Clin Romande Readaptat, Inst Res Rehabil, Sion, Switzerland
[3] Clin Romande Readaptat, Dept Med Res, Sion, Switzerland
[4] Clin Romande Readaptat, Dept Musculoskeletal Rehabil, Sion, Switzerland
关键词
MCID; Functional tests; Chronic musculoskeletal pain; 6-MINUTE WALK TEST; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TO-STAND TEST; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; HEALTH-STATUS; RESPONSIVENESS; SIT; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundFunctional tests are widely used to measure performance in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our objective was to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Steep Ramp Test (SRT), the 1-min stair climbing test (1MSCT), the sit-to-stand test (STS), the Jamar dynamometer test (JAM) and the lumbar Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients.MethodsA single-center prospective observational study was conducted in a rehabilitation center. Patients with upper-limb, lower-limb or neck/back lesions were included over a period of 21months. We used the anchor-based method as a reference method, supplemented by the distribution-based and opinion-based approaches, to determine the MCIDs.Results838 chronic musculoskeletal pain patients were included. The estimation method and thelesion location had a significant influence on the results. MCIDs were estimated at +75m and +60m for the 6MWT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions, respectively), +18 steps for the 1MSCT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions) and +6kg for the JAM (upper limb lesions). The anchor-based method could not provide valid estimations for the three other scales, but distribution and opinion-based methods provided rough values of MCIDs for the SRT (+39w to +61w), the STS (-5 sec to -7 sec) and the PILE (+4kg to +7kg).ConclusionThe above MCID estimations for the 6MWT, 1MSCT and JAM can be used in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients participating in vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs or in therapeutic trials. The use of specific anchors might give better estimations of MCIDs for the three other scales in future research.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Performance Tests in People With Chronic Low Back Pain Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Change [J].
Andersson, Eleonor I. ;
Lin, Christine C. ;
Smeets, Rob J. E. M. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) :E1559-E1563
[2]  
[Anonymous], 53 PNR
[3]  
[Anonymous], NUMBER CRUNCHER STAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], REHABIL NURS
[5]   Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review [J].
Bohannon, Richard W. ;
Crouch, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 23 (02) :377-381
[6]   SIT-TO-STAND TEST FOR MEASURING PERFORMANCE OF LOWER-EXTREMITY MUSCLES [J].
BOHANNON, RW .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1995, 80 (01) :163-166
[7]   2-MINUTE, 6-MINUTE, AND 12-MINUTE WALKING TESTS IN RESPIRATORY-DISEASE [J].
BUTLAND, RJA ;
PANG, J ;
GROSS, ER ;
WOODCOCK, AA ;
GEDDES, DM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 284 (6329) :1607-1608
[8]  
Cleeland C. S., 1994, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V23, P129
[9]   Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Schuler, Thomas C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) :541-546
[10]   ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test [J].
Crapo, RO ;
Casaburi, R ;
Coates, AL ;
Enright, PL ;
MacIntyre, NR ;
McKay, RT ;
Johnson, D ;
Wanger, JS ;
Zeballos, RJ ;
Bittner, V ;
Mottram, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (01) :111-117