Numerical investigation of the cavity shedding mechanism in a Venturi reactor

被引:20
作者
Fang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Li, Qiang [1 ]
Wang, Zhenbo [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch New Energy, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Weihai Ocean Vocat Coll, Weihai 264300, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cavitation; Venturi reactor; Compressibility; Shedding mechanism; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; CAVITATING FLOW; SPECIAL EMPHASIS; CLOUD CAVITATION; DYNAMICS; PRESSURE; VALIDATION; JET; VERIFICATION; INSTABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119835
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The shedding mechanism is a hot topic in cavitation research, and the shedding mechanisms induced by the re-entrant jet and bubbly shock, respectively, have been long studied and debated. In this study, based on experimental research, a numerical investigation of a Venturi reactor is performed using a self-developed compressible cavitation phase-change solver in order to determine the shedding mechanism. Through the quasi-periodic evolution of the cavity, combined with the contour of streamwise velocity and pressure, the main characteristics and physical signs of the re-entrant jet and bubbly shock mechanisms are studied. The effect of the pressure ratio on the shedding mechanism is also studied. It was found that, in a Venturi reactor with a long throat, the evolution of cavitation is divided into an inception stage, a development stage, two shedding stages, and a collapse stage. The main characteristic of the shedding mechanism induced by the re-entrant jet is the separation between the cavity and the wall. The physical sign of this type of shedding is the axial fracture of the whole cavity. Shedding induced by the re-entrant jet dominates the first shedding in the diffusion section. The main characteristic of the bubbly shock shedding mechanism is damage to the cavity caused by pressure waves or shocks, which accelerates cavity shedding and restrains cavity development. The physical sign of this type of shedding is circumferential defects and fractures in the cavity. The second shedding is jointly caused by the re-entrant jet and bubbly shock. The second shedding cavity may collapse rapidly or merge with the newly formed cavity, which can damage or strengthen the newly formed cavity, respectively. With the decrease of the pressure ratio, the effect of the bubbly shock shedding mechanism is weakened. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, MODELLING INJECTOR F
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1955, T AM SOC MECH ENG, DOI DOI 10.1115/1.4014586
  • [3] Arndt REA., 2000, Instability of Partial Cavitation: A Numerical/Experimental Approach
  • [4] SOME REMARKS ON HYDROFOIL CAVITATION
    Arndt, Roger E. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2012, 24 (03) : 305 - 314
  • [5] Polymeric Hopkinson Bar-Confinement Chamber Apparatus to Evaluate Fluid Cavitation
    Bustamante, M. C.
    Singh, D.
    Cronin, D. S.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 2018, 58 (01) : 55 - 74
  • [6] The cavitation instability induced by the development of a re-entrant jet
    Callenaere, M
    Franc, JP
    Michel, JM
    Riondet, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2001, 444 : 223 - 256
  • [7] Application of spherical nanoindentation to determine the pressure of cavitation impacts from pitting tests
    Carnelli, Davide
    Karimi, Ayat
    Franc, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2012, 27 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [8] Friction Drag Reduction of External Flows with Bubble and Gas Injection
    Ceccio, Steven L.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2010, 42 : 183 - 203
  • [9] Numerical investigation of periodic cavitation shedding in a Venturi
    Charriere, Boris
    Goncalves, Eric
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2017, 64 : 41 - 54
  • [10] Large eddy simulation of the tip-leakage cavitating flow with an insight on how cavitation influences vorticity and turbulence
    Cheng, H. Y.
    Bai, X. R.
    Long, X. P.
    Ji, B.
    Peng, X. X.
    Farhat, M.
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2020, 77 : 788 - 809