Likelihood reinstates Archaeopteryx as a primitive bird

被引:59
作者
Lee, Michael S. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Worthy, Trevor H. [3 ]
机构
[1] S Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
bird origins; Theropoda; maximum likelihood; Bayesian inference; Archaeopteryx; phylogeny; CHARACTER DATA; MIXED MODELS; PHYLOGENETICS; EVOLUTION; FEATHERS;
D O I
10.1098/rsbl.2011.0884
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The widespread view that Archaeopteryx was a primitive (basal) bird has been recently challenged by a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis that placed Archaeopteryx with deinonychosaurian theropods. The new phylogeny suggested that typical bird flight (powered by the front limbs only) either evolved at least twice, or was lost/modified in some deinonychosaurs. However, this parsimony-based result was acknowledged to be weakly supported. Maximum-likelihood and related Bayesian methods applied to the same dataset yield a different and more orthodox result: Archaeopteryx is restored as a basal bird with bootstrap frequency of 73 per cent and posterior probability of 1. These results are consistent with a single origin of typical (forelimb-powered) bird flight. The Archaeopteryx-deinonychosaur clade retrieved by parsimony is supported by more characters (which are on average more homoplasious), whereas the Archaeopteryx-bird clade retrieved by likelihood-based methods is supported by fewer characters (but on average less homoplasious). Both positions for Archaeopteryx remain plausible, highlighting the hazy boundary between birds and advanced theropods. These results also suggest that likelihood-based methods (in addition to parsimony) can be useful in morphological phylogenetics.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 303
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Model tests of gliding with different hindwing configurations in the four-winged dromaeosaurid Microraptor gui [J].
Alexander, David E. ;
Gong, Enpu ;
Martin, Larry D. ;
Burnham, David A. ;
Falk, Amanda R. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (07) :2972-2976
[2]   The posterior and the prior in Bayesian phylogenetics [J].
Alfaro, Michael E. ;
Holder, Mark T. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2006, 37 :19-42
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MESOZOIC BIRDS HEADS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Phylogenetic systematics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4
[6]   The flight of Archaeopteryx [J].
Chatterjee, S ;
Templin, RJ .
NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 2003, 90 (01) :27-32
[7]   Mosaicism, modules, and the evolution of birds: Results from a Bayesian approach to the study of morphological evolution using discrete character data [J].
Clarke, Julia A. ;
Middleton, Kevin M. .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2008, 57 (02) :185-201
[8]   THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX [J].
FARRIS, JS .
CLADISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE WILLI HENNIG SOCIETY, 1989, 5 (04) :417-419
[9]  
Felstenstein J., 2004, INFERRING PHYLOGENIE
[10]  
Gauthier J, 2001, NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE ORIGIN AND EARLY EVOLUTION OF BIRDS, P7