Is Abortion Included in Maternal and Child Health Curricula in the United States?

被引:2
作者
Burns, Meredith [1 ,2 ]
Rochat, Roger [3 ]
Bryant, Amy G. [4 ]
Andersen, Kathryn [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] IPAS, POB 9990,300 Market St, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, 1518 Clifton Rd NE,Room 7005, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Family Planning, 4002 Old Clin Bldg CB 7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Abortion; Maternal and child health; Public health education; Curriculum;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-018-2578-y
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess whether Maternal and Child Health (MCH) graduate programs address abortion content in their programs' foundational courses, elective courses, and general curricula. Description Between January and March 2017, we conducted a descriptive study with faculty from the 13 Centers of Excellence in Maternal and Child Health Education, Science and Practice (COEs). We reviewed syllabi and discussed foundational and elective course content via email and key informant interviews with COE faculty. We categorized abortion coverage in foundational courses as "transparent" or "tangential" depending on inclusion of the word "abortion" in course syllabi. We identified electives addressing abortion as electives including abortion and courses that focus on abortion as "abortion-specific electives". Assessment Evidence demonstrated that most programs do not transparently address abortion in required course curricula. Only one of 13 COEs transparently addresses abortion in the foundational course(s); seven COEs tangentially include abortion in foundational courses; and all programs address abortion in some capacity though no standard exists to ensure its inclusion. Despite barriers, including avoidance of controversy and fear of losing funding, COEs could address abortion by establishing shared curricular standards, facilitating values clarification and attitude transformation activities, utilizing information-sharing networks, strengthening relationships between MCH programs and abortion-related organizations, and using professional societies. The scope of our study does not allow us to conclude why abortion content is lacking nor the quality of current content. Conclusion MCH programs should transparently incorporate abortion content in foundational and electives courses to educate students on how to engage with complex and sometimes stigmatized public health issues.
引用
收藏
页码:1556 / 1562
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
American Public Health Association (APHA), 1991, ACC AB ENS AV QUAL P
[2]  
Anderson L, 2013, ABORTION ED PRESSURE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V118, P389, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822c992d
[4]  
[Anonymous], GLOB LIB WOMENS MED
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, WORLD REP DIS
[6]  
Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health, 2017, MCH SYLL PROJ
[7]  
Athey JL, 2000, BUILDING FUTURE MATE, V87
[8]  
Barar R. E, 2015, OUR EXPERT URGES POL
[9]   Abortion education in nurse practitioner, physician assistant and certified nurse-midwifery programs: a national survey [J].
Foster, AM ;
Polis, C ;
Allee, MK ;
Simmonds, K ;
Zurek, M ;
Brown, A .
CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 73 (04) :408-414
[10]   Obstetrician-gynecologist experiences with abortion training: physician insights from a qualitative study [J].
Freedman, Lori ;
Landy, Uta ;
Steinauer, Jody .
CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (06) :525-530