Pressure ulcers: e-learning to improve classification by nurses and nursing students

被引:91
作者
Beeckman, Dimitri [1 ]
Schoonhoven, Lisette [2 ]
Boucque, Hilde [3 ]
Van Maele, Georges
Defloor, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Care Res WOK, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Katholieke Hogesch Sint Lieven, Aalst, Belgium
关键词
classification; education; nurses; nursing; pressure ulcer; students;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02200.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives. To detect problems when classifying pressure ulcers and to examine whether an e-learning program is able to increase the classification skills of qualified nurses and nursing students. Background. Both the distinction between pressure ulcer grades and the differentiation between moisture lesions is difficult. Misclassification and incorrect identification of the lesions results in inadequate preventive and therapeutic measures. Education and training are important for spreading evidence-based insights about this topic. Design. Repeated measure design, consisting of one pretest and three posttests. Methods. The experimental intervention consisted of a one-hour session during which the participants independently went over an e-learning program. The control intervention consisted of a one-hour lecture. Both interventions had the same learning contents. A convenience sample of 212 qualified nurses and 214 final-year nursing students was randomly assigned to an experimental-and a control group. Results. In the pretest, the classification skills were low. After the intervention, these skills improved significantly in both groups. The nursing students achieved better results when using the e-learning program. Among the qualified nurses, there was no difference between the learning methods. Although the classification skills decreased in the posttests, they did not drop under the level of the pretest. Conclusion. The actual classification system does not provide the necessary information about the severity of a pressure ulcer. The differential diagnosis between a moisture lesion was complicated. The classification skills of the qualified nurses and nursing students increased by both learning methods. Repetition remains, however, necessary. Relevance to clinical practice. Both instruction methods are adequate to acquire the knowledge about the differences between moisture lesions and pressure ulcers. E-learning allows studying in one's own time and place, and could therefore be very suitable for repetition of the training. How to organise this training could be a subject for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:1697 / 1707
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Ankrom Michael A, 2005, Adv Skin Wound Care, V18, P35, DOI 10.1097/00129334-200501000-00016
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, Pressure ulcers: guidelines for prevention and nursing management
  • [3] BATESJENSEN BM, 1997, CHRONIC WOUND CARE C, P37
  • [4] Bliss M R, 1998, J Tissue Viability, V8, P4
  • [5] Bolwell C, 1993, Decubitus, V6, P20
  • [6] Collier M, 1999, J Wound Care, V8, P63
  • [7] Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system
    Defloor, T
    Schoonhoven, L
    Katrien, V
    Weststrate, J
    Myny, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 54 (02) : 189 - 198
  • [8] Statement of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel - Pressure ulcer classification - Differentiation between pressure ulcers and moisture lesions
    Defloor, T
    Schoonhoven, L
    Fletcher, J
    Furtado, K
    Heyman, H
    Lubbers, M
    Witherow, A
    Bale, S
    Bellingeri, A
    Cherry, G
    Clark, M
    Colin, D
    Dassen, T
    Dealey, C
    Gulacsi, L
    Haalboorn, J
    Halfens, R
    Hietanen, H
    Lindholm, C
    Moore, Z
    Romanelli, M
    Soriano, JV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2005, 32 (05) : 302 - 306
  • [9] Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs
    Defloor, T
    Schoonhoven, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2004, 13 (08) : 952 - 959
  • [10] *EPUAP, 1999, EPUAP REV, V1, P31