A CRITIC-TOPSIS framework for hybrid renewable energy systems evaluation under techno-economic requirements

被引:35
作者
Babatunde, M. O. [1 ]
Ighravwe, D. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lagos, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Akoka, Nigeria
[2] Bells Univ Technol, Dept Mech & Biomed Engn, Ota, Nigeria
关键词
Techno-economic criteria; Hybrid renewable energy system; CRITIC-TOPSIS; WASPAS; Simulation; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS; MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; RURAL ELECTRIFICATION; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; DESIGN; DIESEL; OIL; PERFORMANCE; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.5267/j.jpm.2018.12.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The electricity generation policy is a strategic policy that drives development in a community. Energy policies are often analyzed with the aim of generating a reliable and affordable electricity for a community. There is a high probability of achieving this aim when energy policy is combined with a community social, technical, economic and environmental needs. This paper determines a hybrid renewable energy source (HRESs) for a rural community using technical, economic, and techno-economic criteria. The selection process combines Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) as a solution method. This approach applicability was tested using six HRESs under economic and technical criteria. Ten technical and nine economic criteria were simulated for the HRESs using HOMER. The results from the HOMER software show that A(5)(PV/wind/battery) and A(6) (PV/battery) had a renewable fraction of 1. The results obtained from the CRITIC method showed that the most important technical and economic criteria were diesel generator and total fuel cost, respectively. From an economic perspective, the best HRES for the case study was A(4) (diesel/batteries), while A(3) (wind/diesel generator/batteries) was the best HRES from a technical and techno-economic perspectives. (C) 2019 by the authors; licensee Growing Science, Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 126
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
    Chen, CT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [12] Energy supply for sustainable rural livelihoods. A multi-criteria decision-support system
    Cherni, Judith A.
    Dyner, Isaac
    Henao, Felipe
    Jaramillo, Patricia
    Smith, Ricardo
    Font, Raul Olalde
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) : 1493 - 1504
  • [13] Feasibility analysis of hybrid photovoltaic/battery/fuel cell energy system for an indigenous residence in East Malaysia
    Das, Himadry Shekhar
    Tan, Chee Wei
    Yatim, A. H. M.
    Lau, Kwan Yiew
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 76 : 1332 - 1347
  • [14] DETERMINING OBJECTIVE WEIGHTS IN MULTIPLE CRITERIA PROBLEMS - THE CRITIC METHOD
    DIAKOULAKI, D
    MAVROTAS, G
    PAPAYANNAKIS, L
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1995, 22 (07) : 763 - 770
  • [15] Ewa R., 2011, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, P200
  • [16] A multicriteria approach to sustainable energy supply for the rural poor
    Henao, Felipe
    Cherni, Judith A.
    Jaramillo, Patricia
    Dyner, Isaac
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 218 (03) : 801 - 809
  • [17] Optimal planning and design of hybrid renewable energy systems for microgrids
    Jung, Jaesung
    Villaran, Michael
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 75 : 180 - 191
  • [18] Techno-economic valuation and optimization of integrated photovoltaic/wind energy conversion system
    Kaabeche, Abdelhamid
    Belhamel, Maiouf
    Ibtiouen, Rachid
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2011, 85 (10) : 2407 - 2420
  • [19] A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Kaya, Ihsan
    Cebi, Selcuk
    [J]. ENERGY, 2009, 34 (10) : 1603 - 1616
  • [20] The energy balance of sunflower production for biodiesel in Greece
    Kallivroussis, L
    Natsis, A
    Papadakis, G
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2002, 81 (03) : 347 - 354