Embedded Performance Validity Tests in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised: A Replication Study

被引:81
作者
Bailey, K. Chase [1 ]
Soble, Jason R. [1 ]
Bain, Kathleen M. [1 ]
Fullen, Chrystal [1 ]
机构
[1] South Texas Vet Hlth Care Syst, Psychol Serv, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
Performance validity assessment; HVLT-R; BVMT-R; Veterans; Psychometrics; TRIAL; 1; FALSE;
D O I
10.1093/arclin/acx111
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Embedded performance validity tests (PVTs) within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) were recently identified. This study aimed to further validate/replicate these embedded PVTs. Method: Eighty clinically referred veterans who underwent neuropsychological evaluation were included. Validity groups were established by passing/failing 2-3 well-validated PVTs, with 75% (n = 60) classified as valid and 25% (n = 20) noncredible. Fifty-two percent of valid participants were cognitively impaired. Results: HVLT-R Recognition Discrimination (RD) of <= 5 yielded 67% sensitivity/80% specificity for identifying noncredible performance. Removal of seven valid participants with an amnestic profile who produced a false positive, improved specificity to 92%, which replicated the original findings. Replication efforts failed for BVMT-R Percent Retained; however, significant findings for RD were elucidated. Conclusion: Replication efforts were positive for the HVLT-R embedded PVT, corroborating its ability to identify invalid performance in this heterogeneous clinical veteran sample with and without cognitive impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 900
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PSYCH TEST SERV DIS
[2]  
Benedict R.H.B, 1997, BRIEF VISUOSPATIAL M
[3]   Revision of the brief visuospatial memory test: Studies of normal performance, reliability, and validity [J].
Benedict, RHB ;
Schretlen, D ;
Groninger, L ;
Dobraski, M ;
Shpritz, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1996, 8 (02) :145-153
[4]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[5]  
Boone K.B., 2002, The Dot Counting Test manual
[6]  
Brandt J., 2001, Psychol Assess Resour
[7]  
Carter MJ, 2014, THER RECREAT J, V48, P275
[8]   The Efficiency and Accuracy of The Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Errors on the First 10 Items of The Test of Memory Malingering, and Five Embedded Measures in Predicting Invalid Test Performance [J].
Denning, John H. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (04) :417-432
[9]  
Green P., 2003, GREENS WORD MEMORY T
[10]   High Specificity of the Word Memory Test and Medical Symptom Validity Test in Groups with Severe Verbal Memory Impairment [J].
Green, Paul ;
Montijo, Jorge ;
Brockhaus, Robbi .
APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) :86-94