A scoping review of interactive and personalized web-based clinical tools to support treatment decision making in breast cancer

被引:17
作者
Zhao, Amy [1 ,2 ]
Larbi, Maya [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Miller, Kristen [3 ]
O'Neill, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
Jayasekera, Jinani [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Oncol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Georgetown Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Canc Prevent & Control Program, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Hlth Natl Ctr Human Factors Healthcare, Washington, DC USA
[4] Towson Univ, Towson, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Web-based decision tools; Treatment; Breast cancer; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; PREDICTION MODELS; COMPUTER-PROGRAM; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; WOMEN; RISK; AID; NOMOGRAM; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The increasing attention on personalized breast cancer care has resulted in an explosion of new interactive, tailored, web-based clinical decision tools for guiding treatment decisions in clinical practice. The goal of this study was to review, compare, and discuss the clinical implications of current tools, and highlight future directions for tools aiming to improve personalized breast cancer care. We searched PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify web-based decision tools addressing breast cancer treatment decisions. There was a total of 17 articles associated with 21 unique tools supporting decisions related to surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, bisphosphonates, HER2-targeted therapy, and chemotherapy. The quality of the tools was assessed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standard instrument. Overall, the tools considered clinical (e.g., age) and tumor characteristics (e.g., grade) to provide personalized outcomes (e.g., survival) associated with various treatment options. Fewer tools provided the adverse effects of the selected treatment. Only one tool was field-tested with patients, and none were tested with healthcare providers. Future studies need to assess the feasibility, usability, acceptability, as well as the effects of personalized web-based decision tools on communication and decision making from the patient and clinician perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 57
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A Scoping Review of Decision Support Tools for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: Toward Shared Decision-Making [J].
Yu, Annie X. ;
Ding, Joel B. ;
Davies, Alun H. ;
Shan, Leonard L. .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 106 :25-36
[32]   Pilot testing a web-based decision aid in breast cancer for personalised treatment choices: a case analysis [J].
Oprea, Natalia ;
Ardito, Vittoria ;
Chiem, Jean Christophe ;
Salvaggio, Samuel ;
Matos, Leonor ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Minisini, Alessandro ;
Bonotto, Marta ;
Ciani, Oriana .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (02) :NP42-NP42
[33]   The role of time in involving patients with cancer in treatment decision making: A scoping review [J].
Wieringa, Thomas H. ;
Leon-Garcia, Montserrat ;
Suarez, Nataly R. Espinoza ;
Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose ;
Jacome, Cristian Soto ;
Zisman-Ilani, Yaara ;
Otten, Rene H. J. ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Pieterse, Arwen H. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 125
[34]   Genomic based personalized chemotherapy analysis to support decision systems for breast cancer [J].
Saribudak, Aydin ;
Gundry, Stephen ;
Zou, Jianmin ;
Uyar, M. Umit .
2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND APPLICATIONS (MEMEA) PROCEEDINGS, 2015, :495-500
[35]   A critical literature review of dyadic web-based interventions to support cancer patients and their caregivers, and directions for future research [J].
Luo, Xingjuan ;
Gao, Lihong ;
Li, Jieyu ;
Lin, Yi ;
Zhao, Jie ;
Li, Qiuping .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 29 (01) :38-48
[36]   Utility of electronic decision-support tools for patients with head and neck cancer: A scoping review [J].
Kushniruk, Andre W. ;
Stringer, Eleah .
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & E-LEARNING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 13 (04) :477-499
[37]   A web-based personalized decision support tool for patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ: development, content evaluation, and usability testing [J].
Fridman, Ilona ;
Chan, Lok ;
Thomas, Jennifer ;
Fish, Laura J. ;
Falkovic, Margaret ;
Brioux, Jacquelyn ;
Hunter, Nicole ;
Ryser, Daniel H. ;
Hwang, E. Shelley ;
Pollak, Kathryn, I ;
Weinfurt, Kevin P. ;
Ryser, Marc D. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 192 (03) :517-527
[38]   Expanding access to veterinary clinical decision support in resource-limited settings: a scoping review of clinical decision support tools in medicine and antimicrobial stewardship [J].
Yusuf, Havan ;
Hillman, Alison ;
Stegeman, Jan Arend ;
Cameron, Angus ;
Badger, Skye .
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
[39]   Improving Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment Decision Making: The iCanDecide Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Hawley, Sarah T. ;
Li, Yun ;
An, Lawrence C. ;
Resnicow, Kenneth ;
Janz, Nancy K. ;
Sabel, Michael S. ;
Ward, Kevin C. ;
Fagerlin, Angela ;
Morrow, Monica ;
Jagsi, Reshma ;
Hofer, Timothy P. ;
Katz, Steven J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (07) :659-+
[40]   Usage Patterns of Web-Based Stroke Calculators in Clinical Decision Support: Retrospective Analysis [J].
Kummer, Benjamin ;
Shakir, Lubaina ;
Kwon, Rachel ;
Habboushe, Joseph ;
Jette, Nathalie .
JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 9 (08)