Dynamic and frequency-domain spillover among within and cross-country policy uncertainty, crude oil and gold market: Evidence from US and China

被引:15
作者
Huang, Jianbai [1 ,3 ]
Dong, Xuesong [1 ]
Zhang, Hongwei [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Jia [1 ]
Gao, Wang [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Inst Met Resources Strategy, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei Univ Econ & Businesss, Res Ctr Finance & Enterprise Innovat, Shijiazhuang 050062, Peoples R China
[5] Hebei Univ Econ & Business, Sch Finance, Shijiazhuang 050062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Economic policy uncertainty; Oil market; Gold market; Spillover analysis; Time varying; PRICE SHOCKS; VOLATILITY; TIME; CONNECTEDNESS; RETURNS; ECONOMIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102938
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The recent Sino-U.S. trade conflict has made the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) between China and the US on the global market gradually become a hot topic. This paper uses a spillover directional measure to investigate the cross-category spillovers among crude oil and gold markets and policy uncertainties within and between China and the US during the period from 2000 to 2019. To obtain more reliable conclusions, this paper measures both the return and volatility spillover effects in two domains: time and frequency. The results of the empirical indicate that the US is a critical spillover transmitter on average compared with China. The spillover effects based on the time-domain framework show a strong connectedness among EPU and crude oil and gold markets. Moreover, during the intensification of financial turmoil, the interaction among EPU and crude oil and gold markets increased dramatically. With regard to frequency-domain analysis, many of the spillover effects of uncertainty occur in the short-term frequency of 1-3 months.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Does the US economic policy uncertainty connect financial markets? Evidence from oil and commodity currencies [J].
Albulescu, Claudiu Tiberiu ;
Demirer, Riza ;
Raheem, Ibrahim D. ;
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 83 :375-388
[2]   Uncertainty and crude oil returns [J].
Aloui, Riadh ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Miller, Stephen M. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 55 :92-100
[3]  
Anderson D., 2015, SPILLOVERS CHINA ONT
[4]   Dynamic connectedness of uncertainty across developed economies: A time-varying approach [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Gabauer, David ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Plakandaras, Vasilios .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 166 :63-75
[5]   Economic risk contagion among major economies: New evidence from EPU spillover analysis in time and frequency domains [J].
Bai, Lan ;
Zhang, Xuhui ;
Liu, Yuntong ;
Wang, Qian .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 535
[6]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636
[7]  
Barunik J., 2014, J FINANC MARK, V26, DOI [10.48550/arXiv.1308.1221, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1308.1221]
[8]   Measuring the Frequency Dynamics of Financial Connectedness and Systemic Risk [J].
Barunik, Jozef ;
Krehlik, Tomas .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2018, 16 (02) :271-296
[9]   Exchange rate expectations and economic policy uncertainty [J].
Beckmann, Joscha ;
Czudaj, Robert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2017, 47 :148-162
[10]   Economic policy uncertainty and risk spillovers in the Eurozone [J].
Bernal, Oscar ;
Gnabo, Jean-Yves ;
Guilmin, Gregory .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2016, 65 :24-45