The influence of a dominating centre on a quantitative systematic review of granisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting

被引:41
作者
Kranke, P
Apfel, CC
Eberhart, LH
Georgieff, M
Roewer, N
机构
[1] Univ Wuerzburg, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
关键词
meta-analysis; quantitative systematic review; post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV); publication bias; granisetron;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045006659.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: We performed a meta-analysis on granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and further investigated whether total results and the dose-response characteristics may be significantly affected by a single centre. Methods: Systematically searched randomised controlled trials (RCT) using granisetron for the prevention of PONV after general anaesthesia were included in the analysis. The pooled relative risks (RR) and numbers needed to treat (NNT) with their corresponding 95%-confidence intervals C(I) were calculated. For all centres, one dominating centre and other centres pooled, comparisons were performed according to all doses, low dose (less than or equal to 20 mug/kg) and high dose (> 20 mug/kg) granisetron. Results: A total of 27 RCT with 2938 patients were included in the analysis. RR (CI) to suffer from PONV with granisetron when all comparisons were considered was 0.46 (0.39-0.54), 0.7 (0.6-0.81) and 0.34 (0.28-0.41) for all doses, low and high dose, respectively RR of the dominating centre (1867 patients) were significantly better compared to the remaining centres (1071 patients), with 0.41 (0.34-0.49) and 0.60 (0.49-0.73), respectively. In the dominating centre low dose granisetron was ineffective with a RR of 0.84 (0.68-1.04), while high dose granisetron led to a strong decrease with a RR of 0.30 (0.26-0.36). In contrast, the RR of other centres pooled for low and high dose granisetron were comparable with 0.62 (0.49-0.79) and 0.56 (0.42-0.75), respectively. Conclusions: Overall results and dose-response characteristics of meta-analyses may be significantly altered by one dominating centre. Further, if data of a dominating centre do not appear to be valid for other centres, it may seem advisable to either exclude them from the analysis or to perform sub-group analyses so that results without the data from the dominating centre are available.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 670
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting -: Conclusions from cross-validations between two centers
    Apfel, CC
    Läärä, E
    Koivuranta, M
    Greim, CA
    Roewer, N
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (03) : 693 - 700
  • [2] CARNAHAN D, 1997, J AANA, V65, P154
  • [3] The dose-response relation and cost-effectiveness of granisetron for the prophylaxis of pediatric postoperative emesis
    Cieslak, GD
    Watcha, MF
    Phillips, MB
    Pennant, JH
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (05) : 1076 - 1085
  • [4] *COCHR COLL, 2000, REV MAN REV MAN COMP
  • [5] THE NUMBER NEEDED TO TREAT - A CLINICALLY USEFUL MEASURE OF TREATMENT EFFECT
    COOK, RJ
    SACKETT, DL
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6977) : 452 - 454
  • [6] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [7] Omission of nitrous oxide during anesthesia reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting - A meta-analysis
    Divatia, JV
    Vaidya, JS
    Badwe, RA
    Hawaldar, RW
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (05) : 1055 - 1062
  • [8] Droperidol and 5-HT3-receptor antagonists, alone or in combination, for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting -: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Eberhart, LHJ
    Morin, AM
    Bothner, U
    Georgieff, M
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (10) : 1252 - 1257
  • [9] Eberhart LHJ, 2000, ANAESTHESIST, V49, P713, DOI 10.1007/PL00002508
  • [10] Meta-analysis - Bias in location and selection of studies
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7124): : 61 - 66