All-Inside Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

被引:45
作者
Ardizzone, Carolyn A. [1 ]
Houck, Darby A. [1 ]
McCartney, Derek W. [1 ]
Vidal, Armando F. [1 ,2 ]
Frank, Rachel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Orthoped, Div Sports Med & Shoulder Surg, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Steadman Clin, Vail, CO USA
关键词
meniscus; all-inside; bucket-handle; arthroscopic; ARTHROSCOPIC EVALUATION; MEDIAL MENISCUS; HUMAN KNEE; FOLLOW-UP; SUTURE; MENISCECTOMY; DEVICE; AREA;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520906141
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is no consensus on technique of choice for repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears (BHMTs). Purpose: To determine factors that affect patient outcomes and failure rates in patients undergoing all-inside repairs of BHMTs. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of 3 databases using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed. All English-language literature from 1993 to 2019 describing clinical outcomes for patients undergoing all-inside BHMT repair with >= 12-month follow-up was reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Patient characteristics (patient sex, age), intraoperative factors (laterality, concomitant procedures, surgical technique, implants utilized), and postoperative outcomes (failure rates) were analyzed. Study quality was evaluated with the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Results: Fifteen studies (1 level 1, 4 level 3, 10 level 4) with 763 total patients (64% male; average age, 26.4 years [range, 9-58 years]; average follow-up, 39.8 months [range, 12-120 months]) including 396 all-inside BHMT repairs were included. Six devices were used for repair including the Meniscal Repair System, FasT-Fix, Meniscus Arrow, Biofix Arrow, RapidLoc device, and PDS II suture, with failure rates of 13.5%, 22.4%, 27.1%, 42.9%, 45.2%, and 0%, respectively. The overall repair failure rate was 29.3% at an average of 13.0 months (range, 5.0-32.4 months), but 19.0% for devices still in use. The RapidLoc and Biofix Arrow had higher failure rates than other devices (P = .0003). Women (31%) were less likely to experience a failure than were men (69%) (P = .03). Longer follow-up duration resulted in higher failure rates (>30 months, 34.4%; <30 months, 23.4%; P = .016). In 4 studies reporting on both all-inside and inside-out repairs, no significant differences in failure rates were observed. No significant differences in failure rates were found between medial and lateral repairs nor repair with and without concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (P > .05 for all). The overall average MCMS was 54.4 +/- 12. Conclusion: The overall failure rate after all-inside repair of BHMTs is 29.3% at an average of 13.0 months, with no difference in failure rates between medial and lateral meniscal repairs. The variables shown to negatively affect the failure rates were the RapidLoc and Biofix Arrow, male sex, and longer follow-up duration.
引用
收藏
页码:3386 / 3393
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Biomedical devices in meniscal repair [J].
Harris, Barton ;
Miller, Mark D. .
SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2006, 14 (03) :120-128
[22]   Two-year follow-up of meniscal repair using a bioabsorbable arrow [J].
Jones, HP ;
Lemos, MJ ;
Wilk, RM ;
Smiley, PM ;
Gutierrez, R ;
Schepsis, AA .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (01) :64-69
[23]   All-inside suture device is superior to meniscal arrows in meniscal repair: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial with 2-year follow-up [J].
Kise, Nina Jullum ;
Drogset, Jon Olav ;
Ekeland, Arne ;
Sivertsen, Einar Andreas ;
Heir, Stig .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (01) :211-218
[24]   Arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repair using a new refixation device: A prospective study [J].
Laprell, H ;
Stein, V ;
Petersen, W .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (04) :387-393
[25]  
Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1136/bmj.i4086]
[26]   All-inside meniscus repair - A systematic review [J].
Lozano, Jesus ;
Ma, C. Benjamin ;
Cannon, W. Dilworth .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (455) :134-141
[27]   Accelerated rehabilitation after arthroscopic meniscal repair: A clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation [J].
Mariani, PP ;
Santori, N ;
Adriani, E ;
Mastantuono, M .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (06) :680-686
[28]   Changes in Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics Following Radial Split and Vertical Tears of the Medial Meniscus An in Vitro Investigation of the Efficacy of Arthroscopic Repair [J].
Muriuki, M. G. ;
Tuason, D. A. ;
Tucker, B. G. ;
Harner, C. D. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (12) :1089-1095
[29]   Meniscal Repair Outcomes at Greater Than Five Years A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Nepple, Jeffrey J. ;
Dunn, Warren R. ;
Wright, Rick W. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 94A (24) :2222-2227
[30]   Arthroscopic meniscus repair with bioabsorbable arrows [J].
Petsche, TS ;
Selesnick, H ;
Rochman, A .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (03) :246-253