A Midurethral Sling to Reduce Incontinence after Vaginal Prolapse Repair

被引:244
|
作者
Wei, John T. [1 ]
Nygaard, Ingrid [2 ]
Richter, Holly E. [3 ]
Nager, Charles W. [4 ]
Barber, Matthew D. [5 ]
Kenton, Kim [6 ]
Amundsen, Cindy L. [7 ]
Schaffer, Joseph [8 ]
Meikle, Susan F. [9 ]
Spino, Cathie
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Loyola Univ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[7] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[8] Univ Texas SW, Dallas, TX USA
[9] Natl Inst Child Hlth & Human Dev, Bethesda, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; STRESS-INCONTINENCE; WOMEN; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; RISK; TAPE;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1111967
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Women without stress urinary incontinence undergoing vaginal surgery for pelvicorgan prolapse are at risk for postoperative urinary incontinence. A midurethral sling may be placed at the time of prolapse repair to reduce this risk. METHODS We performed a multicenter trial involving women without symptoms of stress incontinence and with anterior prolapse (of stage 2 or higher on a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system examination) who were planning to undergo vaginal prolapse surgery. Women were randomly assigned to receive either a midurethral sling or sham incisions during surgery. One primary end point was urinary incontinence or treatment for this condition at 3 months. The second primary end point was the presence of incontinence at 12 months, allowing for subsequent treatment for incontinence. RESULTS Of the 337 women who underwent randomization, 327 (97%) completed follow-up at 1 year. At 3 months, the rate of urinary incontinence (or treatment) was 23.6% in the sling group and 49.4% in the sham group (P < 0.001). At 12 months, urinary incontinence (allowing for subsequent treatment of incontinence) was present in 27.3% and 43.0% of patients in the sling and sham groups, respectively (P = 0.002). The number needed to treat with a sling to prevent one case of urinary incontinence at 12 months was 6.3. The rate of bladder perforation was higher in the sling group than in the sham group (6.7% vs. 0%), as were rates of urinary tract infection (31.0% vs. 18.3%), major bleeding complications (3.1% vs. 0%), and incomplete bladder emptying 6 weeks after surgery (3.7% vs. 0%) (P <= 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS A prophylactic midurethral sling inserted during vaginal prolapse surgery resulted in a lower rate of urinary incontinence at 3 and 12 months but higher rates of adverse events. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health; OPUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00460434.)
引用
收藏
页码:2358 / 2367
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Midurethral Sling on Urgency Incontinence Symptoms
    Mezes, Christina M.
    Russell, Gregory B.
    Gutman, Robert E.
    Iglesia, Cheryl
    Rardin, Charles
    Kenton, Kimberly
    Collins, Sarah
    Matthews, Catherine A.
    UROGYNECOLOGY, 2025, 31 (03): : 250 - 257
  • [2] Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial
    van der Ploeg, J. Marinus
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    van der Steen, Annemarie
    van Leeuwen, Jules H. Schagen
    van der Vaart, C. Huub
    Roovers, Jan-Paul W. R.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (07) : 1029 - 1038
  • [3] Vaginal Prolapse Repair - Place Midurethral Sling Now or Later?
    Iglesia, Cheryl B.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (25) : 2422 - 2424
  • [4] Urodynamics for incontinence after midurethral sling removal
    Coskun, Burhan
    Lavelle, Rebecca S.
    Alhalabi, Feras
    Lemack, Gary
    Zimmern, Philippe E.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2016, 35 (08) : 939 - 943
  • [5] Does concomitant prolapse repair at the time of midurethral sling affect recurrent rates of incontinence?
    Casiano, Elizabeth R.
    Gebhart, John B.
    McGree, Michaela E.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    Klingele, Christopher J.
    Trabuco, Emanuel C.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (07) : 819 - 825
  • [6] Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial
    J. Marinus van der Ploeg
    Katrien Oude Rengerink
    Annemarie van der Steen
    Jules H. Schagen van Leeuwen
    C. Huub van der Vaart
    Jan-Paul W. R. Roovers
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2016, 27 : 1029 - 1038
  • [7] Quality of Life After Treatment With Midurethral Sling and Concomitant Prolapse Repair in Patients With Mixed Versus Stress Urinary Incontinence
    Lin, Stephanie N.
    Klapper, Allan S.
    Wong, Peter
    Shalom, Dara F.
    Winkler, Harvey A.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2011, 30 (08) : 1507 - 1511
  • [8] Incontinence rates after midurethral sling revision for vaginal exposure or pain
    Jambusaria, Lisa H.
    Heft, Jessica
    Reynolds, Stuart
    Dmochowski, Roger
    Biller, Daniel H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (06)
  • [9] Transvaginal prolapse repair with or without the addition of a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a randomised trial
    van der Ploeg, J. M.
    Rengerink, K. Oude
    van der Steen, A.
    van Leeuwen, J. H. S.
    Stekelenburg, J.
    Bongers, M. Y.
    Weemhoff, M.
    Mol, B. W.
    van der Vaart, C. H.
    Roovers, J-P W. R.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (07) : 1022 - 1030
  • [10] Comparison of Morbidity and Retreatment After Urethral Bulking or Midurethral Sling at the Time of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
    Russell, Rebekah
    Rhodes, Stephen
    Gupta, Ankita
    Bretschneider, C. Emi
    Ferrando, Cecile A.
    Hijaz, Adonis
    Shoag, Jonathan
    Sheyn, David
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (06) : 1468 - 1476