Effect of false-positive results on reattendance at breast cancer screening programmes in Spain

被引:27
|
作者
Alamo-Junquera, Dolores [1 ,2 ]
Murta-Nascimento, Cristiane [1 ]
Macia, Francesc [1 ,3 ]
Bare, Marisa [4 ]
Galceran, Jaume [5 ]
Ascunce, Nieves [6 ]
Zubizarreta, Raquel [7 ]
Salas, Dolores [8 ]
Roman, Ruben [1 ,3 ]
Castells, Xavier [1 ,3 ]
Sala, Maria [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Serv Epidemiol & Avaluacio, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] UPF ASPB, Unitat Docent Med Prevent & Salut Publ, Barcelona, Spain
[3] CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain
[4] UAB, Oficina Tecn Cribratge, Sabadell, Spain
[5] Fundacio Lliga Invest & Prevencio Canc, Programa Deteccio Precoc Canc Mama Tarragona Terr, Reus, Spain
[6] Inst Salud Publ, Programa Detecc Precoz Canc Mama, Pamplona, Spain
[7] Conselleria Sanidade, Direcc Xeral Saude Publ, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[8] Conselleria Sanitat, Oficina Plan Canc, Direcc Gen Salud Publ, Valencia, Spain
关键词
PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOMES; MAMMOGRAPHY PROGRAM; RE-ATTENDANCE; BEHAVIOR; EFFICACY; RECALL; IMPACT; RETURN; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1093/eurpub/ckr057
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Mammography is the only breast screening method, we are aware of today, which is able to reduce mortality from breast cancer. Nevertheless, this procedure carries an inherent risk of false-positive screening mammogram. The association between these results and reattendance at the next scheduled screening mammogram is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a false-positive screening mammogram and women's characteristics on reattendance in eight regional population-based breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Methods: This study included 1 383 032 women aged 44-67 years who were initially screened for breast cancer between 1990 and 2004. To investigate factors associated with reattendance, logistic regression models were used. Results: The mean age of women at first screening was 53.6 years (SD = 6.1 years). Of 120 800 women with a false-positive screening mammogram, 78.3% returned for a subsequent screening mammogram compared with 81.9% of those with a negative result (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that women with a false-positive result at first screening mammogram were less likely to reattend (OR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.70-0.73) and that the likelihood was lower in those who had undergone invasive additional tests (OR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.53-0.59). Conclusion: A false-positive screening mammogram in the first screening negatively affected attendance at the subsequent screening. The results of this study could be useful to improve the screening process and to increase women's compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 408
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammograms
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Fryback, Dennis G.
    Hammond, Cristina S.
    Hanna, Lucy G.
    Grove, Margaret R.
    Brown, Mary
    Wang, Qianfei
    Lindfors, Karen
    Pisano, Etta D.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (06) : 954 - 961
  • [22] Breast cancer detection risk in screening mammography after a false-positive result
    Castells, X.
    Roman, M.
    Romero, A.
    Blanch, J.
    Zubizarreta, R.
    Ascunce, N.
    Salas, D.
    Buron, A.
    Sala, M.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 37 (01) : 85 - 90
  • [23] Increased Risk of Developing Breast Cancer after a False-Positive Screening Mammogram
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Zhu, Weiwei
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (12) : 1882 - 1889
  • [24] Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features
    Castells, Xavier
    Tora-Rocamora, Isabel
    Posso, Margarita
    Roman, Marta
    Vernet-Tomas, Maria
    Rodriguez-Arana, Ana
    Domingo, Laia
    Vidal, Carmen
    Bare, Marisa
    Ferrer, Joana
    Jesus Quintana, Maria
    Sanchez, Mar
    Natal, Carmen
    Espinas, Josep A.
    Saladie, Francina
    Sala, Maria
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (02) : 379 - 386
  • [25] The Effect of False-Positive Results on Subsequent Participation in Chest X-ray Screening for Lung Cancer
    Sato, Akira
    Hamada, Shota
    Urashima, Yuki
    Tanaka, Shiro
    Okamoto, Hiroaki
    Kawakami, Koji
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (12) : 646 - 653
  • [26] The effect of false positive breast screening examinations on subsequent attendance: retrospective cohort study
    Maxwell, Anthony J.
    Beattie, Cathryn
    Lavelle, Janet
    Lyburn, Iain
    Sinnatamby, Ruchi
    Garnett, Shelagh
    Herbert, Annie
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2013, 20 (02) : 91 - 98
  • [27] Clinical and radiological features of breast tumors according to history of false-positive results in mammography screening
    Domingo, Laia
    Romero, Anabel
    Blanch, Jordi
    Salas, Dolores
    Sanchez, Mar
    Rodriguez-Arana, Ana
    Ferrer, Joana
    Ibanez, Josefa
    Vega, Alfonso
    Soledad Laso, M.
    Castells, Xavier
    Sala, Maria
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 37 (05) : 660 - 665
  • [28] Psychosocial consequences among women with false-positive results after mammography screening in Norway
    Solbjor, Marit
    Forsmo, Siri
    Skolbekken, John-Arne
    Siersma, Volkert
    Brodersen, John
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2018, 36 (04) : 380 - 389
  • [29] Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography
    Ho, Thao-Quyen H.
    Bissell, Michael C. S.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (03) : E222440
  • [30] False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Johnson, Kristin
    Olinder, Jakob
    Rosso, Aldana
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Lang, Kristina
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (11) : 8089 - 8099