Effect of false-positive results on reattendance at breast cancer screening programmes in Spain

被引:28
作者
Alamo-Junquera, Dolores [1 ,2 ]
Murta-Nascimento, Cristiane [1 ]
Macia, Francesc [1 ,3 ]
Bare, Marisa [4 ]
Galceran, Jaume [5 ]
Ascunce, Nieves [6 ]
Zubizarreta, Raquel [7 ]
Salas, Dolores [8 ]
Roman, Ruben [1 ,3 ]
Castells, Xavier [1 ,3 ]
Sala, Maria [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Serv Epidemiol & Avaluacio, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] UPF ASPB, Unitat Docent Med Prevent & Salut Publ, Barcelona, Spain
[3] CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain
[4] UAB, Oficina Tecn Cribratge, Sabadell, Spain
[5] Fundacio Lliga Invest & Prevencio Canc, Programa Deteccio Precoc Canc Mama Tarragona Terr, Reus, Spain
[6] Inst Salud Publ, Programa Detecc Precoz Canc Mama, Pamplona, Spain
[7] Conselleria Sanidade, Direcc Xeral Saude Publ, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[8] Conselleria Sanitat, Oficina Plan Canc, Direcc Gen Salud Publ, Valencia, Spain
关键词
PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOMES; MAMMOGRAPHY PROGRAM; RE-ATTENDANCE; BEHAVIOR; EFFICACY; RECALL; IMPACT; RETURN; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1093/eurpub/ckr057
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Mammography is the only breast screening method, we are aware of today, which is able to reduce mortality from breast cancer. Nevertheless, this procedure carries an inherent risk of false-positive screening mammogram. The association between these results and reattendance at the next scheduled screening mammogram is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a false-positive screening mammogram and women's characteristics on reattendance in eight regional population-based breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Methods: This study included 1 383 032 women aged 44-67 years who were initially screened for breast cancer between 1990 and 2004. To investigate factors associated with reattendance, logistic regression models were used. Results: The mean age of women at first screening was 53.6 years (SD = 6.1 years). Of 120 800 women with a false-positive screening mammogram, 78.3% returned for a subsequent screening mammogram compared with 81.9% of those with a negative result (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that women with a false-positive result at first screening mammogram were less likely to reattend (OR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.70-0.73) and that the likelihood was lower in those who had undergone invasive additional tests (OR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.53-0.59). Conclusion: A false-positive screening mammogram in the first screening negatively affected attendance at the subsequent screening. The results of this study could be useful to improve the screening process and to increase women's compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 408
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   False-positive result and reattendance in the Ontario breast screening program [J].
Chiarelli, AM ;
Moravan, V ;
Halapy, E ;
Majpruz, V ;
Mai, V ;
Tatla, RK .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2003, 10 (03) :129-133
[12]  
Deck W., 2006, SCREENING MAMMOGRAPH
[13]   Determinants of non attendance to mammography program in a region with high voluntary health insurance coverage [J].
Esteva, Magdalena ;
Ripoll, Joana ;
Leiva, Alfonso ;
Sanchez-Contador, Carmen ;
Collado, Francisca .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 8 (1)
[14]   REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
FLETCHER, SW ;
BLACK, W ;
HARRIS, R ;
RIMER, BK ;
SHAPIRO, S .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (20) :1644-1656
[15]   The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: re-attendance related to the women's experiences, intentions and previous screening result [J].
Hofvind, SSH ;
Wang, H ;
Thoresen, S .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2003, 14 (04) :391-398
[16]  
Johnson MM, 1996, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V87, P176
[17]   EFFICACY OF SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY - A METAANALYSIS [J].
KERLIKOWSKE, K ;
GRADY, D ;
RUBIN, SM ;
SANDROCK, C ;
ERNSTER, VL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (02) :149-154
[18]   The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer [J].
Lampic, C ;
Thurfjell, E ;
Sjödén, PO .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 39 (12) :1730-1737
[19]  
Landeghem P. van, 2006, Archives of Public Health, V64, P81
[20]  
Lipkus IM, 2000, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V9, P402, DOI 10.1002/1099-1611(200009/10)9:5<402::AID-PON475>3.0.CO