Exclusion Criteria in National Health State Valuation Studies: A Systematic Review

被引:26
作者
Engel, Lidia [1 ,2 ]
Bansback, Nick [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bryan, Stirling [2 ,3 ]
Doyle-Waters, Mary M. [2 ]
Whitehurst, David G. T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, 8888 Univ Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[2] Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Evaluat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] St Pauls Hosp, Ctr Hlth Evaluat & Outcome Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
exclusion criteria; health state valuation; preference-based measures; quality-adjusted life year; TIME TRADE-OFF; NONPARAMETRIC BAYESIAN METHOD; ESTIMATING QUALITY WEIGHTS; PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURE; POPULATION-BASED VALUES; SOCIAL VALUE SET; UNITED-STATES; EQ-5D; SF-6D; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X15595365
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Health state valuation data are often excluded from studies that aim to provide a nationally representative set of values for preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments. The purpose was to provide a systematic examination of exclusion criteria used in the derivation of societal scoring algorithms for preference-based HRQoL instruments. Methods. Data sources included MEDLINE, official instrument websites, and publication reference lists. Analyses that used data from national valuation studies and reported a scoring algorithm for a generic preference-based HRQoL instrument were included. Data extraction included exclusion criteria and associated justifications, exclusion rates, the characteristics of excluded respondents, and analyses that explored consequential implications of exclusion criteria on the respective national tariff. Results. Seventy-six analyses (from 70 papers) met the inclusion criteria. In addition to being excluded for logical inconsistencies, respondents were often excluded if they valued fewer than 3 health states or if they gave the same value to all health states. Numerous other exclusion criteria were identified, with varying degrees of justification, often based on an assumption that respondents did not understand the task or as a consequence of the chosen statistical modeling techniques. Rates of exclusion ranged from 0% to 65%, with excluded respondents more likely to be older, less educated, and less healthy. Limitations included that the database search was confined to MEDLINE; study selection focused on national valuation studies that used standard gamble, time tradeoff, and/or visual analog scale techniques; and only English-language studies were included. Conclusion. Exclusion criteria used in national valuation studies vary considerably. Further consideration is necessary in this important and influential area of research, from the design stage to the reporting of results.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 810
页数:13
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Valuation and Preliminary Validation of the Greek 15D in a Sample of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease [J].
Aletras, Vassilis H. ;
Kontodimopoulos, Nick ;
Niakas, Dimitris A. ;
Vagia, Maria G. ;
Pelteki, Helen J. ;
Karatzoglou, Grammatiki I. ;
Sintonen, Harri ;
Yfantopoulos, John N. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) :574-579
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUID METH TECHN APPR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, MEAS VAL HLTH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MODELLING UTILITY HL, DOI DOI 10.1007/s11136-015-0926-6
[5]   Argentine Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States [J].
Ariel Augustovski, Federico ;
Edit Irazola, Vilma ;
Pascual Velazquez, Alberto ;
Gibbons, Luz ;
Craig, Benjamin M. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) :587-596
[6]   A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states [J].
Badia, X ;
Roset, M ;
Herdman, M ;
Kind, P .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 21 (01) :7-16
[7]  
BADIA X, 1997, 14 PLEN M EUROQOL GR
[8]   Canadian Valuation of EQ-5D Health States: Preliminary Value Set and Considerations for Future Valuation Studies [J].
Bansback, Nick ;
Tsuchiya, Aki ;
Brazier, John ;
Anis, Aslam .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02)
[9]   Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values [J].
Bansback, Nick ;
Brazier, John ;
Tsuchiya, Aki ;
Anis, Aslam .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 31 (01) :306-318
[10]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292