Nanofiltration of nonionic surfactants: Effect of the molecular weight cutoff and contact angle on flux behavior

被引:54
作者
Cornelis, G
Boussu, K
Van der Bruggen, B
Devreese, I
Vandecasteele, C
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Chem Engn, Lab Appl Phys Chem & Environm Technol, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Centexbel Gent, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ie0501226
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Nonionic surfactants are widely used in industry, and large amounts of wastewater containing nonionic surfactants are produced each year. Nanofiltration (NF) is a possible option to purify these waters, reducing the overall water consumption and enhancing biological purification. However, the flux behavior of NF during purification of wastewaters containing nonionic surfactants is not well understood. NF tests were performed with both synthetic solutions and real wastewaters containing nonionic surfactants from carpet rinsing. When a membrane with a relatively high molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) was chosen, flux decreased to a level lower than that with most ultrafiltration membranes. When a low MWCO was chosen, flux either increased above pure water flux when a relatively hydrophobic membrane was chosen or decreased when a relatively hydrophilic membrane was chosen. NF thus seems feasible to reduce water usage in industrial processes involving nonionic surfactants when a proper membrane is selected. It appeared that flux is controlled by three mechanisms: first, the narrowing of membrane pores through adsorption of monomers when the MWCO is comparable or larger than the monomer size, causing flux decline; second, an improved wettability of the membrane surface through adsorption of monomers on hydrophobic groups, causing flux to increase above pure water flux; third, a decreased wettability through adsorption of monomers on hydrophilic groups, causing flux decline. The nonionic surfactant concentration, MWCO, and membrane's hydrophilicity determine which mechanism is dominant.
引用
收藏
页码:7652 / 7658
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Shear stimulated adsorption of surfactants from micellar solutions [J].
Bakx, A ;
Timmerman, AMDE ;
Frens, G .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2001, 183 :149-157
[2]   The flow of concentrated surfactant solutions through narrow capillaries [J].
Bakx, A ;
Timmerman, A ;
Frens, G .
COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE, 2000, 278 (05) :418-424
[3]   Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics [J].
Childress, AE ;
Elimelech, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (17) :3710-3716
[4]   Interaction behaviour in ultrafiltration of nonionic surfactants .2. Static adsorption below CMC [J].
Doulia, D ;
Tragardh, G ;
Gekas, V .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 123 (01) :133-142
[5]   THE EFFECT OF SURFACTANT PRETREATMENT ON THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEINS [J].
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD ;
KIM, KJ .
DESALINATION, 1985, 53 (1-3) :37-55
[6]   Optimised product and water recovery from batch-production rinsing waters [J].
Goers, B ;
Mey, J ;
Wozny, G .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (08) :651-658
[7]   Flexible design and operation of a two-step UF/NF-system for product recovery from rinsing waters in batch production [J].
Goers, B ;
Wozny, G .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (10-11) :93-100
[8]   THE INFLUENCE OF NONIONIC AND IONIC SURFACTANTS ON HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES [J].
JONSSON, AS ;
JONSSON, B .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1991, 56 (01) :49-76
[9]   The effects of Fenton's reagent pretreatment on the biodegradability of nonionic surfactants [J].
Kitis, M ;
Adams, CD ;
Daigger, GT .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (11) :2561-2568
[10]  
*METC EDD INC, 1991, WAST ENG TREATM DIS