Removal of taste and odor from drinking water: performance evaluation and upgrade options for the treatment plants in Istanbul

被引:2
作者
Fakioglu, Malhun [1 ]
Karpuzcu, Mahmut Ekrem [1 ]
Toroz, Ismail [1 ]
Yildiz, Fatih [2 ]
Ozturk, Izzet [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tekn Univ Istanbul, Insaat Fak, Cevre Muhendisligi Bolumu, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Su Aritma Daire Baskanligi, Istanbul Su & Kanalizasyon Idaresi, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI | 2020年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
Drinking water treatment; Full scale treatment; 2-MIB; Geosmin; ACTIVATED CARBON; GEOSMIN; 2-METHYLISOBORNEOL; CYANOBACTERIA; BROMATE; MIB;
D O I
10.5505/pajes.2019.78949
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Istanbul, one of the most crowded cities in the world with approximately 15 million population, has various surface water sources. The city is recently having taste and odor problem originating from 2-MIB and Geosmin due to algal blooms occurring in these water sources. The aim of this study is not only to evaluate the removal of taste and odor compounds in water treatment plants, but also to improve the efficiency of existing removal processes along with suggesting new processes that are effective for the removal of these compounds. In this context; measurements were evaluated along with performing the experiments for the alternative chemicals and a detailed cost analysis were made for the proposed new processes. In 5 main water treatment plants of ISKI, removal efficiencies with ozonation were 2-14% for TOC, 35-62% for 2-MIB and 34-52% for Geosmin, between the years 2013-2016. According to the experimental results, applying 10 mg/L powdered activated carbon with alum provided the highest removal efficiency for 2-MIB (50%) and Geosmin (66%) while TOC removal was higher with FeCl3 (38%). UV254 removal was within the range of 60-70% for all three coagulants. Turbidity removal was quite higher with FeCl3 compared to PACl. Finally, the applicability of peroxone process to the existing plants were evaluated. According to the calculations, unit cost for a water treatment plant with a 100,000 m(3)/day capacity was found as 0.027 $/m(3) (0.14 TL/m(3)) for the peroxone system. This cost is 20% higher than a sole ozonation system.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 512
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] American Public Health Association E.A.D.A.W.W.A.W.E.F., 2005, STANDARD METHODS EXA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, TASTE ODOUR SOURCE D
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, MAN CYAN DRINK WAT S
  • [4] Removal of 2-methylisoborneol and geosmin in surface water treatment plants in Arizona
    Bruce, D
    Westerhoff, P
    Brawley-Chesworth, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2002, 51 (04): : 183 - 197
  • [5] The application of powdered activated carbon for MIB and geosmin removal: Predicting PAC doses in four raw waters
    Cook, D
    Newcombe, G
    Sztajnbok, P
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (05) : 1325 - 1333
  • [6] Fakioglu M., 2017, THESIS
  • [7] Fakioglu M., 2017, THESIS
  • [8] Evaluation of algae related taste and odor problem in drinking water
    Fakioglu, Malhun
    Karpuzcu, Mahmut Ekrem
    Ozturk, Izzet
    [J]. PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2018, 24 (06): : 1141 - 1156
  • [9] FERGUSON DW, 1990, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V82, P181
  • [10] Optimising water treatment practices for the removal of Anabaena circinalis and its associated metabolites, geosmin and saxitoxins
    Ho, Lionel
    Tanis-Plant, Paul
    Kayal, Nawal
    Slyman, Najwa
    Newcombe, Gayle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2009, 7 (04) : 544 - 556